THE
BROKEN BLUEPRINT
PART
FOUR
HOW
OUR SCHOOLS ARE
DESTROYING OUR CHURCH
(1935
- ONWARD)
The
molding influence of a doctoral program
Our
Bible teachers since the 1960s
Enter
Desmond Ford
Accreditation
agencies to the rescue
Impact
of liberalism on our students
A
single issue of a college newspaper
Catholic
priest gives week of prayer
How
to enjoy all the sex you want
Sex
all over the campus
PART
FOUR
HOW
OUR SCHOOLS
ARE
DESTROYING
OUR
CHURCH
(1935 -
ONWARD)
The decisions made from 1910
onward to obtain approval by the world for Loma Linda, cast a long
shadow. Each year that shadow deepens. Ask the young people in our
colleges what they are being taught, whether there are any standards,
what they are doing in their off-hours, and what recreational events and
Saturday night amusements the school provides for them. You will be
surprised at what you learn.
By
1940, all our colleges in the United States had
received partial or full accreditation. This meant that they were
required to submit to requirements of worldly agencies.
By the
1950s, most of the teachers in our colleges, with the
exception of many of our Bible teachers, had Ph.Ds. By the early 1960s,
most of our Bible teachers had them also.
THE MOLDING INFLUENCE OF A DOCTORAL PROGRAM
Those not familiar with the
system do not realize that obtaining a Ph.D. involves an intense and
lengthy effort by the university to mold the mind of the student. Their
studied objective is to grant doctoral degrees to students who are a
credit to the university, graduates who believe what it believes and
will teach what it teaches.
In a baccalaureate or
masters program, the emphasis is on learning what is taught you and
learning it well. A quantity of objectionable and even atheistic
information may be included; but you are required to learn it, whether
or not you fully believe it. However, the environment has an effect on
your thinking, and you are likely to graduate with a worldly, doubting
mind-set.
In contrast, as a candidate in
a doctoral program, you work very closely with a single professor. It is
part of his job to make sure your views have been molded into something
of which he can fully approve. You have many private conferences with
that professor. During these meetings, he delves into your thinking and
you open your thoughts to him. If your views do not satisfactorily
conform to his, you will not receive your doctorate. Throughout the
doctoral program, you are well-aware of this fact.
Whatever the field may be, if
you have a skeptical attitude you are more likely to receive his
approval.
In a secular university, it is
expected that you will believe wholeheartedly in evolution, and you will
not believe that a lot of things in the Bible actually happened.
If it is a Protestant or
Catholic school, you should believe that our world was formed from a gas
cloud billions of years ago, which came from a still earlier Big Bang 15
or 20 billion years ago which God arranged. You are on dangerous ground
if you really believe that the Bible is inspired, that sins need be put
away, or that Christ can help us do it.
Thus you can see that, although it
is problematic enough to hire men and women who have received
bachelors and masters degrees from outside colleges and
universities, it is even worse to hire doctoral graduates.
OUR BIBLE TEACHERS SINCE
THE 1960s
If they do not hire enough
Ph.D.s., our colleges and universities will have their accreditation
placed on probation and then canceled. This fact makes it difficult for
the administrationor the churchto refuse the request of the
faculty to teach this or that course, with whatever slant they care to
give to it.
By the late 1950s, many of our
college Bible teachers had Ph.D.s. By the mid-
1960s, all of those in the U.S. had them. Science
teachers bring in evolutionary sentiments. English teachers introduce
worldly literature. But Bible teachers with Ph.D.s bring in
non-Adventist theological concepts.
It is the Bible teachers who
are in charge of teaching religion to the students. Those students later
become the future workers, pastors, administrators of the church, and
its businessmen and professionals.
When our youth study religion
for several years under men with doctoral degrees, their minds in turn
become molded. They must please the teacher, if they are to get good
grades. If the young man is a theology student, great pressure is placed
on him to conform.
In his earlier years he may
have found Christ, dedicated his life, believed the Bible, and loved the
Spirit of Prophecy. But four years at college frequently changes him. To
make matters worse, in
1960, the General Conference ruled that all theology
students had to take advanced studies at Andrews University. But that
extra year or two under doctoral professors only intensified the
changeover in their thinking.
Apparently, our leaders forgot
to read the minutes of the 1935 Autumn Council. Indeed, by 1960, they
appear to have forgotten the whole story of our educational crisis over
accreditation and degrees in the 1920s and 1930s.
A friend of ours decided to
attend Southern Missionary College in the late 1980s. The first day of
class, very boldly, the Bible teacher looked around the class and said,
Theres no one here who believes there is a literal sanctuary
building in heaven, is there? He then stared around the room. That
test question was the first sentence out of his mouth. Everyone was dead
quiet. They knew they better be. Satisfied, he started his instruction.
Recognizing what was ahead, our friend withdrew from the school a few
weeks later.
On a visit to Andrews
University in
1981, the present writer spoke with a graduate
student who wanted to obtain its highest degree in religion. But he said
that he had already been privately told by a faculty member that, unless
he accepted the new theology, he would not be graduated. So after
obtaining his masters, he left.
While there, the present
writer learned that there were only two professors in the Seminary,
another in the undergraduate Department of Religion, and the fourth in
administration, who adhered to the Spirit of Prophecy and our historic
beliefs. (Since then, two have died, one is very elderly and retired,
and the undergraduate teacher is no longer there.) Yet our Seminary at
Andrews is the funnel through which every North American theology
student, and many of those from overseas, must pass before becoming an
ordained minister.
How did our schools become so
stacked with liberals?
When one of our colleges or
universities decides to hire a new teacher, the professors in that field
are generally consulted. It is thought best to keep them happy, for the
worst thing that can happen to an accredited school is for its Ph.D.s to
quit. (It is well-known that when our religion Ph.D.swhich the school
frequently paid to get their doctoratesquit, they generally are hired
rather quickly by Protestant universities.)
During interviews of
prospective staff members, enough is learned that the religion faculty
encourages administration to hire the more liberal ones. Eventually, the
department is filled with worldly-minded teachers.
Over a period of time, the
professors who exhibit executive ability are moved to higher positions.
Such men become the academic deans and presidents of our schools. Thus
the school administration is eventually captured by the liberals.
Because of the trend, since
1980, for Review editors and the General
Conference Education Department secretary to have a doctorate, liberals
eventually move into those positions as well.
ENTER DESMOND FORD
About
1959, Raymond Cottrell, an associate editor at the
Review, asked F.D. Nichol for permission to ask Adventist Bible teachers
several questions about key prophecies in the book of Daniel. Tallying
up the replies, he found that many of our Bible teachers were uncertain
whether our historic beliefs were true. They had been taught something
different at the universities they attended for their doctorates.
With the permission of Elder
Figuhr, the Daniel Committee began meeting in
1960, in order to standardize the thinking of our
Bible teachers. But, by 1965, it ended amid an air of futility. The
liberals had clashed continually with the conservatives over such
fundamental matters as whether Daniel was talking about the papacy or
Antiochus Epiphanes IV, a minor Syrian king who lived before the time of
Christ.
Already, far too many of our
college Bible teachers no longer believed such fundamental historic
teachings as the 1260- and 2300-year prophecies, the Sanctuary in
heaven, Christs ministry within it, the investigative judgment, or
even the inspiration of the Spirit of Prophecy.
All through the
1960s, the situation in our colleges and universities
gradually became worse as more men and women with doctorates, fresh from
molding by the universities, were hired. Yet none could be fired over
their beliefs, lest the accreditation agencies cause trouble.
Academic freedom was the watchword.
By the mid-1960s, Desmond Ford had
completed doctoral training under F.F. Bruce, at the University of
Manchester in England. Bruce was a dynamic member of the Plymouth
Brethren Church and implanted distinctly non-Adventist beliefs in the
mind of Ford. Similar things happened to other Adventist Bible teachers
elsewhere.
Australia was a microcosm of
what would eventually occur in America, Europe, and elsewhere. For at
least fifteen years, Ford, head of the Bible Department at Avondale,
trained every future pastor in the Australasian (now South Pacific)
Division. That provided him with enough time in which to transform the
ministers and most of the administrators in that part of the world
field! (Avondale supplies pastors and missionaries to Australia; New
Zealand; the South Pacific Islands; and much of Africa,
south-of-the-Sahara.)
Multiply that by what many
other Bible teachers with Ph.D.s were doing elsewhere! In just 20 years,
liberal Bible teachers can change an entire generation of ministers in
the field! Within four years a minister can change a local congregation
and eliminate those who protest.
By the late 1970s, the
situation had become very serious when, on October 27,
1979, Desmond Ford gave a Sabbath afternoon lecture
at Pacific Union College, in which he vigorously attacked several of our
historic beliefs. (For a detailed reply to that lecture, see the present
authors study, How Firm Our Foundation, Part 1-8, now in our
320-page New Theology Tractbook, 8 x 11, $24 + $3.00.)
The situation appeared ominous, for
there were indications that other Bible teachers shared his views. In
order to smooth over the situation, Bible teachers at Andrews wrote our
present 27 Fundamental Beliefs which, amid decided protests, were
approved at the 1980 General Conference Session in Dallas. They were
carefully worded to provide a lot of leeway in which liberals could
safely carry on their work. The July 1980 Glacier View Conference was
held shortly afterward to discuss Fords beliefs.
Ford told the startled General
Conference president, Neal C. Wilson, that he could live with this new,
revised 27-point Statement of Beliefs. This was because the wording had
been changed enough that it provided room for both liberals and
conservatives.
A telling indication of the
strength of the new theology occurred rather quickly. Ford was fired on
Friday at the close of Glacier View; the next afternoon (a Sabbath),
nearly every faculty member of Pacific Union College paid to send a
western union telegram to Wilson demanding that he rehire Ford.
The following week, a large
number of faculty members of Andrews University, including nearly every
Bible teacher, sent a signed petition to Wilson to rehire Ford. Yet
it was those Bible teachers at Andrews who wrote our 1980 Doctrinal
Beliefs revision!
About six months later,
President Wilson wrote an open letter to an inquiring pastor, which was
quietly circulated among our ministers nationwide. In it, Wilson said he
understood the concerns of the young pastor who said he doubted our
historic beliefs and was inquiring as to whether he should resign. In
reply, Wilson told him he should remain in the ministry and just not
discuss his doubts openly.
But, of course, such tolerance
was destined to only spread the doubts and disaffection more rapidly
among our local congregations.
The new theology is
nothing more than a variety of modern Protestant, Catholic, and agnostic
errors, which our Bible teachers were taught in outside universities and
are now teaching in our schools.
ACCREDITATION AGENCIES TO
THE RESCUE
In unity there is strength.
Our Ph.D.s were continually gaining strength, and they knew it. They did
not fear reprisals; for they knew the worldly accreditation agencies
were on their side.
It is a policy of the
accreditation agency to step in when a danger looms that church leaders
may fire a teacher for holding unothodox views.
As soon as trouble is on the
horizon, word is sent to the accreditation agency. It will then send a
team to the school to look it over and threaten removal of accreditation
if anything happens to any of the teachers. Our schools are forbidden to
use religious beliefs as a reason for firing a Ph.D.
This means that the only way a
teacher can be ousted is to pay him a large severance package, generally
a full years salary.
The case of two eastern
college teachers provides an example: One who was handsomely paid to
leave immediately became pastor of a Sundaykeeping church.
In the case of the other, as
is frequently done, the college had earlier paid $60,000 to send him
through for his doctorate. But when they tried to oust him, he protested
so vigorously, that they gave up and moved him to the German Language
Department. He is still there today. Yet that man had earlier told one
student (who taped it) that he did not even believe in the Bible!
When an attempt was made by
the laity of the church in 1981-
1982 to clean out the new theology problem at Pacific
Union College, an inspection team from the accreditation agency suddenly
arrived on campus. It met with teachers and administrators and then
announced that, if the faculty were threatened for their beliefs, the
accrediting association might have to take action. (For much more on
this, see the PUC Papers WM53-60.) Continual six-month delays
on the part of the college board eventually stifled the protests.
Another example occurred in
the last decade of the twentieth century, when the godly president of
the North Pacific Union tried to clean up Walla Walla College and its
rock concerts, faculty-student homosexual club, aberrant theology
teachers, and atheist student articles in the campus newspaper,
Threats from the accrediting
association stopped the reformation fast, and the apostasy at Walla
Walla continues unabated. (If this seems unbelievable, read Life at
Walla Walla CollegePart 1-4 [WM676-679] and eight other
four-page tracts we published documenting the crisisall of which are
now in our book, Crisis at Walla Walla, 8 x 11, 60 pp., $6.00 +
$3.00).
Astoundingly, instead of
fighting the accreditation agencies, our leaders gave our liberal Bible
teachers even more protection from firing. In order to avoid problems
with the agencies, which so obviously held the reins of control over our
colleges and universities, the
1985 Annual Council approved an action which gave all
our college and university Bible teachers academic freedom. This
meant that they could not be fired for what they believed! (See the
present authors study, Theological Freedom [WM110].)
This may seem incredible, yet
it illustrates how important accreditation has become in our church. We
are bound to ithand and foot, and
mind.
All through the
1980s the situation continually worsened. Not only
were erroneous teachings taught on our campuses, but they soon started
appearing in books published by the Review and Pacific Press, and in
church papers. The teachers and the students they taught began writing.
These erroneous concepts
included:
Original sin: the concept
that we were born in sin and cannot stop doing it in this life. It will
never be possible for you, in this world, to live a good, clean,
obedient life.
The atonement was finished
at the cross, so your sins were forgiven and you were saved before you
were born, conditional on your verbal acceptance.
Salvation by profession
alone. Behavioral changes are not necessary. Obedience to the law of God
is legalism.
Christ had the immaculate
nature of Adam before his fall. Therefore, Jesus was not our example;
for, while in this world, it was not possible for Him to sin.
Creation occurred in the
long-distant past, not about 6,000
years ago. There was death and suffering throughout
those long ages. The first chapters of Genesis are parabolic and not
literal.
We would not have this new
theology problem permeating our churches today, if we had never
accredited our colleges and sent our young people to outside schools for
advanced degrees.
In
1980, the present author received a phone call from a
church member in the Northwest. When the believer protested to his
pastor about what he was teaching in the pulpit, the pastor became angry
and defiantly told him, We are not in the majority now, but
eventually we will be. We are going to win! Every year our colleges are
turning out more ministers. The day is coming when we will be in the
majorityand then we will get rid of you!
And so it has proven true.
Tragically, many of our people have left the denomination or been pushed
out.
The only way we can solve the
problem is to return to first principlesto the blueprint God gave us
through the Bible and Spirit of Prophecy.
The only way we can eradicate
the evil is take the ax to the root of the tree, not to its branches.
IMPACT OF LIBERALISM ON
OUR STUDENTS
Adventist college students are
also hurt by this deluge of liberalism that they are thrust into. Even
though they may come from very conservative homes, our youth become
bewildered when they encounter this modernist skepticism in our college
classrooms and the permissiveness granted them in their extra-curricular
activities.
Intra- and interco
llegiate sports are encouraged, theatrical love
stories are staged, condoms are handed out, and no type of sexual
activity or perversion is condemned.
Item: For
nearly a de
cade, La Sierra has had its students spend Sabbath
afternoon mowing yards, cleaning trash, and painting houses as a
community service. They brag about it in the Pacific Union Recorder.
(The students do their homework on Sundays.)
Item:
On February 2,
1990, Lawrence Geraty, president of Atlantic Union
College, sent a memo to the faculty and staff announcing the
appointment of Dr. Frank R. Mazzaglia, an Italian Roman Catholic, as
financial consultant to the college.
Item: On
Sunday, March 18,
1990, part of the faculty and students of Southern
College performed a real witchcraft opera. It was open to the public,
and widely advertised over the radio to the entire Chattanooga area. The
witches stirred their pot, cast in herbs, and pronounced spells,
alternately to capture or kill people. The lead characters were
the sorceress and her fellow witches, called wayward
sisters.
At the end of the opera, Dido
cries out and falls down dead. Cupids gather to her fallen form.
The witches have triumphed, their curse has finally slain the one whom
they hate (Witches Den Opera at Southern College of SDA
[WM275]).
Item: Atlantic
Union College sent students to Wooster, for personal introduction into
patterns of active homosexuals. The purpose was to help them become
better counselors.
Item:
A 1980s issue of the PUC newspaper (Campus Chronicle) reported
that all our North American colleges and universities have pool tables
and TVs.
In reaction to this encouragement
to worldliness, many of the students turn to liquor, promiscuous sex,
dancing, or homosexuality. Here, in brief, are a few news clips. Please
know that many, many pages could be filled with them, but the following
examples should suffice:
A
1989 study at Walla Walla College found that 66
percent of its students used intoxicating beverages, but, according to
Winton Beaven, the average in our schools is not far below that.
Between 40 and
45 percent of male students at Adventist colleges in North America drink
beer, wine or spirits, declared Winton Beaven, assistant to the
president of Kettering College of Medical Arts, at the first board
meeting of the newly formed Institute of Alcoholism and Drug Dependency
at Andrews University. For female students, my estimate is 20 to 25
percent, he said.
Beaven said that
after spending much time and talking with many students, he had received
adequate basis for the assertion. Beaven shared with the board members
the experiences of some of the alcohol dependent Adventist youth he had
encountered.Adventist Review, September 17,
1984, p. 20.
Walla Walla College
protects students: Student services at Walla Walla College do more than
treat the com
mon cold. In addition to treating flu, eye, ear and
sinus problems, they treat sexually transmitted diseases. Records are
completely confidential.
Jeanne Voriers,
office manager, says, We want the students to know that they can come
here with any sensitive problem. Student services provides condoms
to sexually active students . . They also have morning after treatment,
in episodes of unprotected sexual intercourse, and referrals for
pregnancy detection.Statement by Health Services Department,
Walla Walla College.
We
dont keep track of who comes to our dances,
but Id say about half of them are from WWC [Walla Walla College],
says Keith Gallow, a student senator from WWCC [Western Washington
Community College]. Theyre certainly welcome here. They spice up
the dance quite a bit.
Although dancing
isnt generally accepted by the Seventh-day Adventist Church,
students, administrators and deans
estimate that 150-300 WWC students dance regularly. Some believe
up to 75 percent of WWC students
have danced at one point . .
According to
Bigger, dancing is . . by nature, hazardous. Most dancing covers up
the real needs of an individual and treats the symptom, not the
problem, he says. It encourages unhealthy solutions.
Boyatt points out
that historically dancing has been associated with substance abuse,
sexual familiarity and most things that promotes less than Christian
standards . . However policing students activities [requiring them
not to dance] is unrealistic and unhealthy. We prefer to be here to
counsel and explain, says Boyatt.Dancing Comes Out of the
Dark, The [Walla Walla College] Collegian, May 2,
1985, p. 8.
A SINGLE ISSUE OF A
COLLEGE NEWSPAPER
Here are a few samples from just
one issue of one of our college student newspapers.
First, there is page one:
A recent study of
alcohol and drug use here on campus,
Collins [Vice President for Student Affairs] said,
showed that 83 percent of PUC students are not regular alcohol users.
Fully 62 percent of the students surveyed had never used alcohol,
according to the survey. How many faculty members can say that?
Collins asked, jokingly.Pacific Union College Campus Chronicle,
Thursday, February 29,
1996, p. 2.
In a panel
discussion which followed Collins talk, faculty members offered
alternate perspectives. Trivett said he was not interested in the
jewelry issue . . His concerns about student life dealt with basic
integrity and responsibilitynot issues like worldly
music.Ibid.
Farther down the article,
students were quoted as saying that many students lied, and said they
did not drink, so as not to get in trouble (ibid.).
On page 3, the students are
told of a poster competition they can enter and win prize money:
Napas
Jarvis Conservatory has announced a poster art
competition with its spring and summer music and dance activities . .
The Zarzuela festival will feature performances of two popular
Spanish operas, La Gran Via
and La Dolorosa. The Baroque Festival will
feature delightful classic French ballet creations. As these events lend
themselves well to visual expressions, the Jarvis Conservatory is having
a Poster Art Competition to memorialize the two operas and the ballet .
.Ibid., p. 3.
Elsewhere on the page, we are
told that, as do most of our colleges, PUC has exercise rooms with
large television sets and pool tables for the students.
The recreation and
fitness room is currently open from 6 to 12 p.m. and is equipped with a
35 television set, exercise equipment, a weight training machine,
table tennis and pool tables. Although definite dates are not known,
more exercise and entertainment equipment will be arriving as funds are
available.Ibid.
We now turn to page 4. Pacific
Union College, among several other of our colleges, teaches theatrical
production, to prepare students for later careers in stage, screen, and
television. The following paragraph mentions three very worldly plays. Fiddler
on the Roof is the story of a drunken man; the others are not much
better.
PUC senior Melissa
Dulcich leads an experienced cast as Jo, in the unforgettable story of
the March sisters. Dulcich is active in DAS [PUCs Dramatic Arts
Society], having performed in three of the societys previous plays.
She also played the part of Liesl in PUCs 1995 production of The
Sound of Music and is currently involved in the musical Fiddler
on the Roof to be presented at the college in April. Pla
ying the part of Laurie is Thor Aagaard, who has been
involved in four DAS plays, including Shakespeares The Taming
of the Shrew. Ibid., p. 4.
An active movement is on foot
in our colleges and universities to incite rebellion in the students
against the General Conference Session refusal to ordain women
ministers. On March 7, one of the women, illegally ordained to the
ministry at La Sierra, spoke to the student body. The article portrayed
her as a great hero.
Halcyon Westphal
Wilson, a fourth generation SDA minister, will speak for chapel on March
7. Her topic is How my recent ordination has impacted my ministry.
This chapel service is sponsored by the Faculty Womens Forum
in celebration of Womens History Month in March.Ibid.
Page 5 is a picture
page of the latest PUC competitive sports events. Page 9 has an
article on black-white relations, plus a humorous article about the
oddities of ministers. Here are excerpts from an article on p. 10. See
if you can figure it out:
Why does the
perfume of our youth smell like a $2.99 Brut soap on the rope? Here we
stand united as one piece of smelly future nostalgia . . Black Holes. An
X generation subgroup best known for the possession of almost entirely
black wardrobes. Some of us want to blend in like a smooth cup of
sumatra [coffee], others like it black . .
QFM: Quelle fashion
mistake. It was really QFM, Oh man, painter pants? Thats 1979 beyond
belief. Then there are those Silver Belled, cockled Shelled girls who
walk around on campus looking like a walking piece of dinner wear, a
piece of tinfoil over a Sabbath lunch casserole or a space bimbo extra
on Star Trek. The X Generation . . Now that we are on the hill [Howell
Mountain, the location of PUC] and free [from parents and adult
supervision] . . the spirit of rebellion has clothed people in the very
dresses Jezebel was wearing before she was told to take off her red nail
polish and [be] thrown to the dogs . .Ibid., p. 10.
The top article on page 11
notes that Dr. Martin Marty, a very outspoken, liberal theologian at the
University of
Chicago, would be at the College Bookstore on
February 29, to autograph copies of his book, which the students are
encouraged to purchase. He was senior editor of Christian Century at
the time, probably the most
liberal Christian magazine in America.
Below
that is This Week: Calendar of Events. It tells of several
ev
ents which the students are
encouraged to attend. These worldly events are
held on campus and even at a San Francisco downtown theater.
Can you believe that the students are encouraged by the faculty to drive
down to San Francisco by themselves and see and experience what takes
place in one of the wickedest cities in America?
Andrew Lloyd
Webbers Music of the Night, March 13-April 7, Golden
Gate Theater, 1 Taylor at Golden Gate and Market Streets, San Francisco.
Featuring highlights from the musicals The Phantom of the
Night, Miss Saigon, Sunset Blvd., Requiem,
Cats, etc.
SA [PUC Student
Association] presents Cafe 96. It will feature Janis
Loves Jazz with sax player and recording artist Wes Burden, and
the The Poh-etry Corner with area poets. Saturday, March 2,
8 p.m. in Andre [womens] Recreation Room. Admission is free.
CABL Stress
Relief/comedy Show. Wednesday, February 28, 8 p.m. CABL will sponsor
this show in Paulin [music] Hall. Admission is free.
Ray Boltz presents Concert
of a Lifetime. Sunday, March 3, 7 p.m. Buy tickets now for
concert which will be held [on campus] in Pacific Auditorium [the
immense gymnasium, where graduations are held].Ibid., p. 11.
Page 12 has an ad about ecology and the importance
of protecting the earth, etc. The faculty is more concerned about
protecting the environment than protecting the students.
Page 13 is all about intercollegiate
sports competition. Upon arriving at our schools, the students are
enticed to go wild in their adoration of this. We can understand why the
other Christian colleges participate in them, for they do not have
our light. But we know better. The PUC teams travel up and down the
coast, playing other colleges.
If you come across
anyone from the Pioneer womens or mens basketball team, give
them a pat on the back, a handshake, or any other form of
congratulations. The women placed first in the California Coastal
Conference Tournament this past weekend in Southern California; the
men came in second.
The Lady Pioneers
defeated Pacific Christian College in the semi-finals . . They played
Simpson College for the championship and PUC was again victorious . . The Pioneer men played against La Sierra University
during the semi-finals . . Pacific Christian College and PUC were
matched up for the finals.Ibid., p. 13.
Page 14 has an advertisement
for a non-Adventist book on how to get scholarships to universities.
Page 16 has a funny quiz.
Ready to send your children to
PUC? They will really be educated there. The author has spoken with many
parents who learned, too late, that they should not have sent their
children to our academies, colleges, and universities.
Anything worldly is generally
acceptable at todays Adventist colleges. The administration needs
tuition money, and will tolerateor encouragealmost anything to
keep the students happy. This one issue of a single college newspaper,
which you have just reviewed, makes it clear that the administration is
doing all they can to steepen the slippery slope to perdition.
CATHOLIC PRIEST GIVES
WEEK OF PRAYER
The above quotations were take
from the PUC Campus Chronicle, for Thursday, February 29,
1996. Only four
months earlier, the school administration provided the students with a
spiritual preparation for the school yearwhich helped provoke
the students to libertinism.
The fall Week of Spiritual
Emphasis began on October 11, 1995, and was conducted by Brennan Manning,
a devout Roman Catholic, former priest, and teacher in the graduate
school at Catholic University.
Although historic Adventists
had never heard of him, our liberals were different; for they regularly
read Protestant, Catholic, and secular literature. Manning is a
well-known writer who, although he speaks reverently of the Virgin, the
crucifix, the rosary, and the pope, is strongly opposed to any form of
obedience to Gods laws and standards.
Manning began his first talk
with these words, In the words of Francis of Assisi, as he spoke to
Brother Dominic on the road to Umbria, Hi. All the
students laughed, and he spent a week telling funny stories, showing how
Catholics are good people, and declaring that it is worthless to try to
obey any standards of conduct (The Catholic Gospel at Pacific Union
CollegePart 1-2 [WM661-662].)
Frequently, Manning spoke of
his many years as a Catholic, and always favorably. His other primary
message, the one he kept pounding into the students, was that God does
all the sacrificing, and He only wants love from usand He definitely
does not want our obedience. In disobedience, we belong to the faith
community, a code phrase for Catholics and Adventists together.
Christianity does
not make people with better morals, but new creatures who are
professional lovers . . When you accept Christ tonight [you do so] in
the fellowship of the faith community.
God accepts you
just nowas you arewith your beer drinking, your self-hatred . .
The biggest error is: if I change and do better, God will love me.
One day at Notre
Dame [while studying there], I decided to be so good, I would make
Francis of Assisi look like a piker . . But this striving for perfection
is a terrible mistake . . [I found that in spite of] sloppy eating,
uncouth manners, God loved me as I was, not because of what I did. If
Jesus was here right now, would He say Repent! No! He would
say, I love you and have forgiven all your sins.
Not one word about
repentance, obeying God, living a clean life, or putting away sins.
A local resident
sent the present writer a complete set of Mannings sermon tapes for
that week. As a rhetorical device, Manning would suddenly shift from
very soft speaking to strong shouting. Here is one of his screaming
comments:
Even if you go to
church every week, never count another sin, and read your Bible every
daywhen they bury you, you will look like a shriveled-up old fig.
Why? Because your Christianity was a moral code, a moral ethic, a set
of rules and obligations, but it was never a love affair.
I believe with
utter conviction that on the great judgment day, Jesus is only going
to ask you one question, and only one question: Did you believe that
I loved you?
The God of so many
Christians I meet is a God too small. Instead, He [the true God] is a
God who loves us as we are.
Manning told of a direct
revelation he received from Christ to become a monk. It was the winter
of 1968 in the high Spanish desert. He then related delightful stories
of how wonderful it is to be a hermit living in a cave. Once again,
Christ appeared to him.
Once a week, a man
came up on a burro and dropped off a bundle of food, drinking water, and
kerosene for a lamp.
Manning
needed the kerosene, because, as a hermit
monk, he must pray every hour of the day and night, bowing before a
statue and adoring it as he fingered his rosary. (He
was very willing to be obedient to the idol
and the glass beads, but not to God.)
In the cave there
was a stone altar and behind and above it was a crucifix. On the left,
was a bare stone slab as a bed, and a few potato sacks as a mattress.
There was stoneware to cook with, and the kerosene lamp.
On the night of
December 13, 1968, I was praying in the middle of the night when Jesus
Christ appeared to me. He said, For love of you, I left My Father,
and came to you. Those words are still burning in my life.
Such words were impressive
enough to convince many students that Manning was correct when he kept
telling them it was all right to sin. Manning had much more to say. You
can probably purchase the cassettes from PUC (unless they have
mysteriously lost them). Here are excerpts from his final Friday night
presentation:
The central theme of
the Bible is that Gods love can be relied on, no matter what we
do.
And then, shouting:
[Christ says] You
are going to be My disciples, not because you are chaste, celibate,
honest, sober, not because you are church-going, Bible-toting, or
song-singing. You are only My disciples because you have a deep respect
for one another. The only thing that matters is a faith that addresses
itself in love.
Love people a
lot was all that God wanted of them. All the students need do is
love a lot.
How does a faith
address itself in love?
Down in New Orleans
[where Manning now lives], in my church, John has died and he was a good
Catholic. Why was he a good Catholic? not because he never swore, said a
dirty joke, and never missed mass on Sunday.
You wont be known
[in heaven] because youre a card-carrying member of a local church.
Lets do away with
all other criteria, and remember only this: a revolution in love.
Christianity is not
about worship or morality; its about love. Do you really believe that
God loves you, unconditionally, just as you are? Do you really believe
that Jesus loves you beyond infidelity, unworthiness, and sin?
Manning used strange phrases
to intensify his startling message. They helped capture the attention.
Later in the sermon, he shouted with joy:
Happily, your life
and mine looks beyond Calvary to the resurrection. In the words of St.
Augustine, We are Easter men and Easter women, and Allelujah is
our song; we are Easter men and Easter women, and Allelujah is our
song!
The Easter
Christians know that, through baptism, they have been caught up in the
triumph of Jesus over death, and they have received the seed of eternal
lifeand one day that seed is going to burst into glory!
Like [Earnest]
Hemmingways hero in Death in the
Afternoon, theyEaster
men and Easter womengo forth to meet death courageously,
because death is no longer a fearful thing.
We are members of
the redeemed community. Isnt that good news?
Yes, we have been redeemed, and we are Easter men and Easter women, and
Allelujah is our song!
Let us pray.
And then, spoken
slowly as if to drive it into the memory of each bowed head, he says:
Let us awaken each
morning to be an Easter man and an Easter woman, with Allelujah as our
song.
It is intriguing how shallow
are the messages of worldlings. After special music, accompanied by a
guitar, about already being saved, Manning spoke his final strange words
of the week and sat down:
Those who prayed
that I would come here; it shows a deep love for Adventism.
I like the words of
Damon Runyon: Boy, oh boy, I look forward to drinking the cup of new
wine in the tavern at the end of the road. For an alcoholic,
thats heaven!
HOW TO ENJOY ALL THE SEX
YOU WANT
Postscript: On October 11 to
13,
1995, Manning taught the students that sin matters
not, only tolerance and love. Keep sinning and love people a lot
is what he told them. So they thoroughly enjoyed themselves.
Three
weeks after Manning left, the administration
of the college found it necessary to bring in an AIDS expert to give the
students additional instruction. Apparently, their theological freedom
was causing health problems.
On a Sabbath evening
(Friday night, November 3, 1995) in the main sanctuary of the Pacific Union
College Church, the students were told to masterbate and
use condoms in order to avoid AIDS.
The other nights of
the week may be reserved for study, dating, television, and pool tables.
But Friday night is for sermons by former Catholic priests or
instruction in how to practice safe sex. (The students were told in
advance that the program that night was Sabbath Vespers.)
Nancy Hokobo, a
non-Adventist living in Napa Valley at the foot of Howell Mountain where
PUC is located, directed the evening program.
You never get
AIDS when you masterbate, she said. Is this what the theology of
freedom to sin as long as we loveleads to?
Hardly anything was
said about abstinence. The main emphasis of that Sabbath evening
was protected sex. She introduced Greg Smith, a homosexual who,
for the past five years has had AIDS, and Tom Merzon who is his
care-giver. They told the students how they have happily lived
together 13 years, and spoke at length of their deepest affection for
one other. The key point was that they managed to live together without
Tom getting AIDS. How wonderful! What encouragement to the young
students to emulate their example.
Nancy, a very young
lady, said it is important to protect yourself so you can live life and
have sexwithout contracting AIDS. A lot more was said. (Avoiding
Aids at Pacific Union College [WM662].
SEX ALL OVER THE CAMPUS
It is now seven years since
the young lady told the students how to have safe sex on campus. They
are still doing it, according to a January 17,
2002, PUC Campus Chronicle article published
only a few months ago. When, by their lives and by their instruction,
instructors teach students that it is all right to break the law of
Godand there are no penalties for disobedienceconditions such as
these will always exist. Our colleges and universities have become
places which your sons and daughters should not attend.
Two PUC students
were admitted in stable, but woozy, condition to Health services after
suffering carbon monoxide poisoning early Tuesday morning. The couple,
residents of Grainger [mens] and McReynolds [womens] halls,
respectively, spent the night parked in the McReynolds lot and was found
by a fellow student on her way to class the next morning . . What she
saw was two groggy students, lethargically embraced in the back seat . .
This is simply the
latest of an ongoing series of problems related to male-female amatory
entanglements. The issue first arose in late 1998 when an unfortunate
week-long entrapment caused the Music Department to disallow
unauthorized student access to practice rooms.
The potentially
disastrous effects of this decision were reduced by the English
Departments installation of several couches in Stauffer Hall, though
the administration soon ruled against hide-a-beds. Despite this deficit,
Stauffer Hall is still one of the most popular late-night hangouts on
campus . .
Most of the
administrative staff views community [getting together] as an
important part of The PUC Experience, and do not want to
discourage students from getting involved with their peers. We want
everything we do here at PUC to be gentle, using encouragement rather
than enforcement. We are trying our very best to run our programs
without teeth, an administrator tried to explain.
I think we need
to investigate the social issue more thoroughly, stated a PUC
financial administrator. We spend hundreds of thousands of dollars a
year on SA [student association] activities, when one of the biggest
determinants of [ways to increase] enrollment may be something as cheap
as visitation rights [letting them get together].
Im going
back to Walla Walla next quarter, one recent transfer student stated.
Theyre really cool up there; they even have dance parties! Its
no wonder WWC has the reputation of the place to go if you want to get
married. They really try to help you out.
Walla Walla College
reportedly combines the Theology and Nursing majors retreats into one
fun-filled weekend, wh
ere most of the years pairing off takes place . .
My boyfriend used
to live in Nichol, so it was a whole lot easier to spend time with each
other, one girl reports. Now that hes in Grainger we can only
be together in my car.
The fleet of
steamed-up cars parked along the airport frontage road [on the outskirts
of the college] every weekend attests to this dearth in privacy, as do
reports of frequent car camp-outs in campus parking lots . .
At press time, PUC
officials had stated no concrete plan of action to deter students
public display of excessive physical affection . .
Whatever PUCs
final policy entails, Health Services has released a campus-wide memo
outlining its plans for a February 13 Health Fair. The goal of this fair
is to teach PUC students practical preventative measures against leg and
neck cramps and other common ailments, as well as to provide much-needed
information about the dangers of carbon monoxide poisoning.PUC
Campus Chronicle, January 17, 2002, p. 2.
The above article, although
full of ironic witticisms, is discussing an extremely serious subject,
one which can affect people for the rest of their lives.
Whatever the
appearance may be, every life centered in self is squandered. Whoever
attempts to live apart from God is wasting his substance. He is
squandering the precious years, squandering the powers of mind and heart
and soul, and working to make himself bankrupt for eternity. The man who
separates from God that he may serve himself, is the slave of mammon.
The mind that God created for the companionship of angels has become
degraded to the service of that which is earthly and bestial. This is
the end to which self-serving tends.Christs Object Lessons,
pp. 200-201.
It is obvious that school
officials know exactly what is taking place, but they are careful to
look the other way. Nightly room checks in every dormitory could
easily solve the problem, and do it fast. But the situation is not
considered serious. It keeps student enrollment up; and, if pregnancies
occur, Health Services can quietly explain where the girl can get an
abortion. They publicly state that they will provide confidential help.
Does Martin Luthers dictum
apply to our schools today? He wrote
thus of the universities: I am much afraid that the universities will
prove to be the great gates of hell, unless they diligently labor in
explaining the Holy Scriptures, and engraving them in the hearts of
youth. I advise no one to place his child where the Scriptures do not
reign paramount. Every institution in which men are not unceasingly
occupied with the Word of God must become corrupt. Great
Controversy, 140-141.
|