A Critique of the Jeremiah Films Video:
Seventh-day Adventism - The Spirit Behind the Church
Introduction, Indexes, Points #1-#20
by Bob Pickle
(note from webmaster- links on this document connect to
Bob Pickles Site.)
This is a critique of a video on Seventh-day Adventism which I saw in
October of 1999.
Repeatedly the video seemed to try to lead the viewer to look upon
Adventism as a cult or as less than Christian. Having studied into a lot
of the areas covered by the video, it wasn't difficult for me to see that
many of the points covered, if not all, were just not valid. It was
absolutely shocking how much misinformation the video contained, all put
together in a very convincing way.
I spent three months trying to dialog with Jeremiah
Films as well as the author of the script (Lorri MacGregor of MacGregor
Ministries), and two of the former pastors featured on the
video (Dale
Ratzlaff and Mark
Martin). These attempts went nowhere. So the next step I felt
was to provide to the public exactly where the video falls short.
This critique covers a total of 239 points for a video that is about 50
minutes long. Of these 239 points, 232 also relate to the slightly shorter
edition of the video, which runs about 45 minutes long. Thus we have
an average of about 4 or 5 disputed points per minute of footage.
The document has extensive hyperlinks. Look for buttons and hyperlinked
text (typically in a different color and underlined).
Also notice that any emphasis I have supplied in my responses will
always be both bolded and italicized, and that the Bible version used for
quotations, unless otherwise noted, is the King James Version.
The reader will find repeated references to a Documentation Package which
is offered at the end of the video to those wanting proof that the
allegations on the video are true. It is copyrighted 1999 by MacGregor
Ministries, and is analyzed along with the video in this critique.
Sometimes the video confuses Millerite Adventists and First-day
Adventists with Seventh-day Adventists. I have therefore attempted in my
discussion to make clear which group is being referred to.
All the video's disputed points found in the critique are listed in a table
of contents which immediately follows this introduction. They
are also listed in a topical
index which has the points categorized in the following
categories: Major
Factual Errors (a total of 86 points); Lesser
Inaccuracies: Less Important Than "Major Factual Errors"
(65 points); Bad
Quotations: Non-Existent, Rearranged, or Context Removed (12
points); Bad
Pictures: Pictures That Grossly Misrepresent the Facts (4
points); Oversimplifications:
More Detail Would Neutralize Point (18 points); Straw-Man
Arguments: Arguments Against Points That Are Basically Irrelevant
(19 points); Arguments
That Essentially Attack the Bible and Its Teachings (20
points); Statements
That Beg the Question: That Assume To Be Fact What Needs to Be Proven
(4 points); Contradictions:
Arguments or Statements that Demolish Other Arguments or Statements
(9 points); and Arguments
That Essentially Attack Prominent Christian Leaders of Old (2
points).
In categorizing the various points, a bit of subjectivity entered, as
would be expected. For example, was the point a major error or a minor
inaccuracy? To help determine this, I took into consideration the
magnitude of the error, the gravity of the accusation, and the ready
availability of correct information concerning the point. Still, some
would probably categorize the points differently.
Any errors, typographical or otherwise, that are found I would greatly
appreciate being brought to my attention.
I am deeply indebted to the Words of the Pioneers CD-ROM from
Adventist Pioneer Library, to The Published Ellen G. White Writings on
Compact Disk from the White Estate, to the commentaries found on the Online
Bible CD-ROM, and to the Master Christian Library from Ages
Software. These reference tools provided a good bit of the material and
facts found below.
Lastly, let me mention who I have chosen to dedicate this critique to.
Near the end of the video is this statement:
You really just have to search for it yourself, and if you, if you
love the Lord, if you really do, then you really want to know the truth.
(Kim Marshall)
For all such who "really want to know the truth," this
critique is sincerely dedicated.
Table of Contents
- All
quotes of Ellen White in video are from official sources.
False. Some quotes just don't exist at all, or don't exist in
the form portrayed on the video.
- Adventism
is based around the teachings and philosophies of Ellen White.
False. Most Seventh-day Adventist doctrines had been
discovered in the Bible and accepted before she wrote them
out.
- Ellen
White was the founder of the Adventist Church. She
was not the sole founder.
- William
Miller was a powerful preacher. Oversimplification.
Miller was a Baptist preacher, and but one of 200 preachers
and 500 lecturers from many denominations all preaching about
the same thing.
- Miller
taught that Christ would return in 1843.
Oversimplification. His major point of difference with the
theology of the times was not the date, but his conviction
that Christ would come visibly and literally before the
millennium instead of after.
- Miller
taught that Christ would return on October 22, 1844.
False. As of October 21, he had not yet accepted the date of
October 22, much less taught it.
- October
22 was not the Day of Atonement in 1844 False.
Biblically speaking, it was the Day of Atonement for that
year.
- Miller's
meetings were marked by emotionalism and hysteria.
False. Miller and his associates suppressed all such things.
- Picture
depicts radical fanaticism of Miller's meetings.
False. Picture is actually of a critic's description of a
post-1844 meeting that Miller was not present at.
- When
Christ did not return, Ellen White said she was in a
"hopeless condition for months." She said
no such thing.
- Ellen
White was depressed when Christ did not return on October 22.
False. The record indicates that she was not.
- Ellen
White could not admit her mistake of expecting Christ to
return in 1843 or 1844. False. She first admitted
what she thought was a mistake, and then admitted that she had
made a mistake in identifying the wrong mistake.
- Miller
admitted his mistake of expecting Christ to return in 1843 or
1844. Oversimplification. He did not admit a
mistake in his interpretations of the prophecies. Rather, he
thought there must be a mistake in the chronologies used by
historians, which might throw his calculations off a little.
- Ellen
White's first vision said that the 1843 chart should not be
altered. False. Her first vision was in December
1844. This one was on September 23, 1850.
- Ellen
White claimed God hid the mistake. Bad quotation.
The last clause that was omitted explains that her words meant
that God was not revealing the mistake to the people, rather
than hiding it.
- Ellen
White claimed God had made the mistake. False. She
made no such claim.
- Ellen
White's vision was controversial. False. There was
nothing controversial about it.
- Ellen
White's vision forced readjustment of many Adventist dates and
doctrines. False. Many dates and doctrines were not
readjusted as the result of either her first vision or the
vision of 1850.
- Ellen
White's vision readjusted the 1843 date to 1844.
False. It was already readjusted months before she had her
first vision.
- The
1844 date was still an error. Cannot be presently
proven. No better interpretation of the prophecies in question
has ever been found.
- Ellen
White became the absolute authority figure. False.
She never has been the absolute authority figure.
- Her
writings grew to be seventeen times larger than the Bible.
So? Luther, Wesley, and Spurgeon wrote a lot too.
- Adventists
view her writings as inspired as the Bible. So?
Adventists believe in degrees of authority, but not in degrees
of inspiration. One prophet is not more inspired than another,
but the prophets of the Bible have the final say.
- Church
publications use her writings as the last word on doctrine.
False. The Bible is the last word.
- Twenty-seven
Fundamental beliefs say that the Bible is a source
of authority. False. They state that the Bible is the
source of authority.
- Ellen
White's writings are an authoritative source of
truth. So? The Adventist quote referred to ends by
saying that the Bible is to be the standard by
which Ellen White's writings are tested.
- Some
of Ellen White's writings are unavailable, locked in a vault.
False. All published writings are available on CD-ROM.
Unpublished writings are available at 15 locations, and are
only locked away after hours.
- Her
more embarrassing writings are unavailable.
Oversimplification. What makes them embarrassing is that
sometimes she had to rebuke people's problems, like adultery.
- She
claimed an angel stood by her bed. So? Angels came
to visit Bible writers too.
- History
shows that Ellen White's prophecies did not come true.
Not one sound, clear-cut example is given.
- She
said Jerusalem would never be built up. The phrase
"built up" had a different meaning at times back
then.
- Ellen
White said she would be alive and would be caught up in the
air to meet Jesus. This undermines faith in the
Bible, for the apostle Paul said the same thing.
- She
said the second coming was only months away. False.
She said no such thing.
- At
a conference in 1856, she said that some present would be food
for worms and that some would be alive when Jesus came.
Oversimplification. The video omits an immediate fulfillment
in which a woman actually present at the conference was
impressed that she would "food for worms." She was
dead within three days.
- Ellen
White would have been stoned in Bible times for being a false
prophet. Then so would the biblical prophets Jonah
and Huldah. Some prophecies are conditional, as Jeremiah tells
us.
- She
predicted the downfall of the United States. False.
She predicted defeat if certain conditions
didn't change.
- She
made false predictions during the Civil War. This
quotation from Ellen White has been rearranged.
- Ellen
White predicted England would declare war on the United
States. False. She never said England would declare
war.
- She
predicted world war during the Civil War. False.
She never said there would be world war at that
time.
- Ellen
White predicted the humbling of the United States in defeat.
False. She predicted the nation's humbling, which came to
pass, but she never said the nation would be
defeated.
- She
claimed to travel to other planets in vision. So?
John, Ezekiel, and Paul as well tell us about their
supernatural journeys in the Bible.
- Ellen
White said animals and people crossed sexually.
False. She said no such thing.
- The
picture indicates that Ellen White believed that the crossing
of people and animals produced the black race.
Ellen White never said if she was talking about Blacks,
Whites, or Asians. There is no basis for the use of such a
picture.
- Her
visions are unbiblical. This begs the question, for
not one unbiblical aspect of her visions has been shown.
- Adventists
say her writings are as inspired as the Bible. This
straw man is answered already under #23.
The Documentation Package's documentation for this
point makes it clear that Adventists believe the Bible is the
final authority, not Ellen White.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine was a reinterpretation.
Not really, for Miller had been teaching for over a decade
prior to 1844 that the judgment was about to begin.
- Miller's
prediction of October 22, 1844, failed. As
mentioned under #6,
Miller didn't make this prediction or even accept it. As far
as his calculations go, his most learned opponents, like Dr.
George Bush, could find no fault in them, and the greatest
scholars of several centuries had come to similar conclusions.
- Adventists
believed that the door of mercy was shut on October 22.
It's not hard to see why they believed this for a short time.
- Adventists
believed that the door of mercy was shut on October 22.
Peter and the apostles thought the door of mercy was closed to
the Gentiles. Should we reject them as being part of a cult?
- With
prophetic authority Ellen White supported the
shut-door-of-mercy doctrine. False. She never did.
- Her
first vision taught the shut-door-of-mercy doctrine.
False. Her first vision taught that there would have to be a
lot of evangelism yet before Christ returned.
- The
preface to the reprinting of her first vision said there was
no change in idea or sentiment. It said no such
thing. Instead, the preface said that a portion was left out.
- The
other shut-door-of-mercy passages were dropped after 1851.
False. There were no other shut-door passages.
- The
other shut-door-of-mercy passages were reinterpreted after
1851. False. Besides there being no other shut-door
passages, the "reinterpretations" came well before
1851.
- Adventists
never admitted their error regarding expecting Jesus to come
in 1844. False. Adventists freely admitted their
error.
- Ellen
White immediately put God's endorsement on Edson and Crosier's
conclusions. Oversimplification. She put God's
endorsement on their conclusions before she had heard about
them.
- All
doctrines were soon adjusted to fit the cleansing of the
sanctuary and the investigative judgment doctrines.
The doctrines identified do not fit this description.
- The
shut door was opened. Oversimplification. As in the
apostolic church, God opened the door of opportunity to reach
others with the truths of His Word. This had nothing to do
with the cleansing of the sanctuary and the investigative
judgment doctrines.
- Soul
sleep was introduced because of the investigative judgment
doctrine. False. Soul sleep was introduced before
October 22, 1844, while the investigative judgment was
formulated afterwards.
- The
prophecies of Daniel and Revelation were reinterpreted to fit
the investigative judgment. The basic
interpretations of Daniel and Revelation were already worked
out before Edson and Crosier published their findings on the
cleansing of the sanctuary in 1846, and before the doctrine of
the investigative judgment was crystallized in 1857.
- It
was a time of doctrinal reversal. Neither the video
nor its documentation provides evidence that that time was
characterized by doctrinal reversal.
- The
idea that an angel is recording everything we do, and that we
will be judged by such a record, is harsh. But
that's what the Bible clearly teaches in Matthew, Revelation,
Daniel, and Ecclesiastes.
- Ellen
White taught that we would be judged for trying to have some
leisure time. False. She taught that we must have
leisure time in order to be balanced people.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine is unique to Seventh-day
Adventists. Not quite. Nearly every basic aspect of
this doctrine has been taught by prominent scholars of other
faiths.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine cannot be supported by the
Scriptures. False. It can be supported by the
Scriptures.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine states that a believer's works
determines their salvation. Not quite. The
investigative judgment doctrine does not teach that the
believer's works determine his salvation in the sense meant by
the typical evangelical when he says, "I'm saved."
- The
investigative judgment doctrine is blatantly unbiblical.
False. This point is similar to #65,
but more Scriptures are added under this number to show that
it is biblical.
- Seventh-day
Adventism is not a legitimate Christian denomination.
This point plainly begs the question, for it assumes what must
be proven.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine teaches that believers will be
lost if they have unconfessed sins. The Bible says
that we can only be forgiven if we confess our sins. Is the
video saying that the Bible is wrong?
- The
investigative judgment doctrine teaches that believers will be
lost if they have forgotten sins. Not even the Documentation
Package could find a quotation to substantiate this wild
charge.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine requires perfect obedience to
the Ten Commandments. But the New Testament plainly
says that adulterers, fornicators, thieves, and murderers
cannot enter heaven.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine teaches that all believers
will be lost if they do not keep the Fourth Commandment.
False. Both Ellen White and the New Testament teach that God
does not hold what we do not know and could not know against
us.
- The
investigative judgment doctrine is diametrically opposed to
the gospel of grace. The points being objected to
by the video are the very essence of the gospel and of the New
Covenant.
-
Seventh-day
Adventism is a man-made religion. This is another
point that begs the question, that assumes what needs to be
proven.
-
Seventh-day
Adventists have their own version of the Bible. Not
so. Jack Blanco's paraphrase is not in any sense an
official Seventh-day Adventist version. I do not own a copy
and have no present intention to get one.
-
This
Seventh-day Adventist version is known as The Clear Word
Bible. Not any more. Quite a few quickly
realized that something like this might come up one day, so
the second edition carries only the title, The Clear Word. The
contributors to the video knew this.
-
In
The Clear Word, the words and ideas of Ellen White are
inserted into the biblical text. False. The words
and ideas of theologian and college professor Jack Blanco, not
Ellen White, are inserted.
-
300
words have been added to Daniel 9 in The Clear Word.
Straw man. As the video admits, it's an expanded paraphrase,
and the interpretations utilized have been held for centuries.
-
Daniel
8:14 is a blatant example of alteration of the biblical text.
Straw man. Paraphrases by their very nature insert
interpretations into the text.
-
It's
called The Clear Word Version. Why did the
makers of the video change the title of Jack Blanco's
paraphrase? It's not called The Clear Word Version.
-
The
Clear Word was written to support their prophetess.
The Clear Word contains the words and ideas of Jack
Blanco, not Ellen White, and was not written to support
"their prophetess."
-
The
Clear Word manipulates and distorts Scripture.
Again, paraphrases contain, by their very nature, the
inclusion of interpretations into the text.
-
Seventh-day
Adventists have also published their Study Bible.
Contradictory argument. If The Clear Word is the
Seventh-day Adventist version, why is the Study Bible a
King James Version instead of The Clear Word?
-
The
Study Bible is "theirs." False. It
was published by a private organization, not the denomination,
so it cannot be said to be "theirs."
-
The
Study Bible of Seventh-day Adventists contains Ellen
White quotes. So? Lots of Bibles contain footnotes
and study helps.
-
Adventists
teach that Christ's atonement on the cross was incomplete.
This is blatantly false. Christ's atonement on the cross was
complete.
-
Adventists
teach the heresy that Michael is Christ. This
charge makes Charles Spurgeon and Matthew Henry heretics. And
the 1599 Geneva Bible must have been put out by
heretics too.
-
Adventists
teach that there is no hell. This is blatantly
false. Adventists consistently teach that there is a hell.
-
Adventists
taught doctrines contrary to tradition. So has
every other Protestant group. The Bible, not tradition, is
(supposed to be) the authority of Protestants.
-
Many
of the doctrines of Adventists are similar to Jehovah's
Witnesses. This is no more true than the statement
that "many" doctrines of other denominations are
similar to Jehovah's Witnesses.
-
N.
H. Barbour was an early Adventist. False. The
impression is left that Barbour was a Seventh-day Adventist,
and there is no evidence that he ever was.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists teach the
heresy of soul sleep. Guess that makes Martin
Luther, John Wycliffe, William Tyndale, and a host of
Baptists, Methodists, Anglicans, and Presbyterians all
heretics. Guess that even makes the apostle Peter himself
a heretic.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists teach the
heresy that Michael is Christ. The Bible clearly
teaches that there is an "angel" sent from God who
Himself is called God. If it isn't Christ, who is it? If it
isn't Christ, must we conclude that the Bible endorses
polytheism, that there is a mere angel who is God as well as
the Father, Son, and Spirit?
-
Uriah
Smith and James White denied the deity of Christ like the
Jehovah's Witnesses. False. They were always firm
believers in the deity of Christ.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists have produced
altered versions of the Bible. False. The New
World Translation is a translation produced by the
Watchtower Society. The Clear Word is an expanded
paraphrase put out by a private individual.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists have set dates
for Christ's return. False. Jehovah's Witnesses
have set dates, but not for Christ's return. And Sabbatarian
Adventists early on took a strong stand against date-setting.
Ellen White opposed such as early as 1845, even before
becoming a Sabbatarian. Seventh-day Adventists as such did not
exist in 1844.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists claim to be the
only remnant church. False. Jehovah's Witnesses
claim that, as of 1991, 99.9169% of Jehovah's Witnesses are
not the remnant.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists plagiarized.
No attempt is made by the video or Documentation Package to
prove that Russell or any Jehovah's Witness ever read J. A.
Brown's book.
-
Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists were
"guilty" of plagiarism. J. A. Brown
published his book in Britain. Since there was no copyright in
America at the time on British books, neither Russell nor
anyone else could be said to be "guilty," even if
they had copied it.
- Walter
Rea's The White Lie was dedicated to those who would
rather believe a bitter truth than a sweet lie.
Oversimplification. The bitter "truth" both declared
and implied by The White Lie is totally repugnant to
evangelicals who believe in the final authority of Scripture.
- Ellen
White's inspiration was borrowed from others without credit.
This argument directly undermines the authority of the
Scriptures, for the Bible writers did the same.
- Ellen
White's major books contained "stolen" material.
What she did cannot be called "stealing" since the
words she took did not belong to the original writers.
- Sketches
from the Life of Paul was plagiarized in its entirety.
False. The books are different, as anyone who peruses them can
plainly see.
- This
resulted in a lawsuit. False. Such a lawsuit would
have been a legal impossibility.
- Because
of this, the book was quickly taken out of print.
False. Published in 1883, the book was promoted in Signs of
the Times through 1885, advertised in Great Controversy
through 1887, and included on the title page of Great
Controversy until 1907 in England, homeland of the authors
who were "stolen" from.
- The
evidence is irrefutable that Ellen White "stole" her
inspiration from others. False. It has already been
demonstrated in this critique that the evidence is anything
but irrefutable.
- The
main line of defense in the book The White Truth is
that there were no copyright laws back then. False.
Out of the six chapters in this 98-page book, one deals with
plagiarism. Out of 16 pages in that chapter, only 4 deal with
what copyright laws were like back then.
- The
White Truth says that there were no copyright laws back
then. False. Page 32 says that the first American
copyright law was passed in 1790.
- The
White Truth sidestepped the issue by concentrating on the
legal question. False. The video is confusing the
two allegations: 1) Ellen White was "guilty" of
theft. 2) Ellen White got her inspiration from others. The
White Truth deals with both allegations, as well as other
points.
-
The
Adventist hierarchy has been unable to respond to Rea's
challenge: Prove that 20% of Ellen White's writings are
original. False. The "hierarchy"
responded to his challenge 31 years before his book was
written.
- Prove
that 20% of Ellen White's writings are original.
Such a challenge doesn't make sense, for it would require
infinite knowledge to prove that 20% of her writings are original.
It makes more sense to say, Prove that 80% of her writings are
not original.
- Her
visions which she claimed came from God were shaky.
One thing the video doesn't touch with a ten-foot pole is the
fact that she didn't breathe and had supernatural strength
during her public visions.
- The
Seventh-day Adventist ministry is not a Christian ministry.
This begs the question, assuming what must be proved. Besides,
Dan Snyder admits under #232
that he was a Christian while being an Adventist minister!
- Ellen
White's early health documents produce a rude awakening
because of their fixation on moral issues. A minor
portion of her early health documents dealt with moral issues.
- Most
of her health advice dealt with suppressing the male sexual
urge. Absolutely ludicrous(!), as anyone who has
read her books knows.
- Most
of her health advice dealt with suppressing the male sexual
urge, which she thought was excessive. Technically,
she was against the excessive indulgence of sexual
urges by both men and women.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] Mrs.
White felt she had been given special light on the subject of
masturbation. That this was the opinion of her
grandson the Documentation Package proves, but no
evidence is ever given to substantiate that Ellen White
herself felt she had been given special light.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] Mrs.
White (apparently) gives a list of diseases caused by
masturbation. Actually, the quotation is not
accurate. The video combines a statement by Mrs. Gove with the
views of Dr. Deslandes. The video adds words, and omits words
and quotation marks without using an ellipsis.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] Mrs.
White (apparently) said kids who masturbate will get green
skin. These are the words of Dr. E. P. Miller, not
Ellen White.
- Ellen
White said that meat inflames the passions. The
quotation leaves this impression only because it is out of
context.
- Ellen
White said rich and highly seasoned foods act as aphrodisiacs.
Medical science has neither proven nor disproven what she
said. It's like when she said that cancer is caused by a germ.
She said this five years before a maverick scientist proposed
the idea. After being ridiculed by the scientific community,
this scientist years later won the Nobel Prize for being
right.
- Ellen
White (apparently) said, "Sip no more the beverage of
China, no more the drinks of Java." These are
the words of Professor O. S. Fowler, not the words of Ellen G.
White.
- Ellen
White advised skipping all suppers in order to bring the male
sexual appetites under control. False. Professor
Fowler said this, not Ellen White. She consistently said that
some people need a third meal (though two meals are better for
most), and even called for Avondale College to begin to serve
suppers.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] Ellen
White (apparently) said the use of feather beds led to
masturbation. False. Dr. E. P. Miller, not Ellen
White, is quoted. He was against sleeping on feather beds in small,
unventilated rooms, not against sleeping on feather
beds per se.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] Ellen
White used a feather bed against her own advice. False.
There is no evidence that she ever used a feather bed in an
unventilated, small room, which would have been against Dr. E.
P. Miller's advice, not her own. She was strongly opposed to
unventilated rooms.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] The
Battle Creek Sanitarium used hydrotherapy to treat secret
vice. Actually, hydrotherapy treatments stimulate
the immune system and increase the white blood cell count.
They have been used successfully to treat a variety of
ailments.
- [Not in all editions of the video.] The
picture illustrating the last point, showing a shivering man
with his feet in boiling water over a camp fire, depicts
Battle Creek's hydrotherapy treatment. False. The
quote the picture is illustrating says that you must not get
chilled. Also, the heat source for a hot foot bath is never
under the basin of water, which is never boiling. The picture
is totally inaccurate.
- Ellen
White controlled her female followers through directives on
dress. False. She was opposed to anyone forcing
convictions about dress on people.
- Ellen
White was against wearing any kind of wig. False.
The context of her statement clearly shows that she was not
talking about simple wigs. Her published and released writings
do not contain the word "wig" at all.
- The
picture of a skeleton looking through a window at a woman who
is presumably putting on a simple wig. The picture
doesn't illustrate at all the heavy monstrosities Ellen White
was talking about.
- After
Ellen White dealt with wigs, she introduced the reform dress.
False. The reform dress was introduced more than six years
before her counsel against heavy hairpieces.
- Ellen
White tried to force the reform dress on people.
False. As pointed out under #128,
she was against forcing the reform dress on anyone.
- The
reform dress was hot. False. Far from being hot, it
was comparatively light. The dress was designed as a healthful
alternative to the too-heavy, too-long, multiple skirts
typically worn by women in those days.
- The
reform dress was uncomfortable. False. This light
dress was designed for comfort as well as for health.
- The
reform dress was bulky. False. Nor was this light
dress bulky.
- The
reform dress was long. False. It was not long.
Besides being called the "reform dress," it was also
called the "short dress."
- Faithful
sisters struggled with the reform dress. False.
Problems arose when these so-called "faithful
sisters" did one of the following: a) wouldn't quit
complaining about not being fashionable, b) pushed the dress
on others contrary to Ellen White's expressed counsel, or c)
constructed it distastefully.
- The
reform dress was cumbersome. False. This light
dress was not cumbersome.
- Ellen
White gave no explanation for why she quit wearing her reform
dress. False. She explained the matter well.
- Ellen
White said those who aren't vegetarians when Jesus comes can't
go to heaven. False. She never made such an extreme
statement.
- Ellen
White taught that you have to keep the letter of the law to
put yourself on the road to salvation. False. She
taught that you are totally incapable of obeying God's
commandments until you have come to Christ.
- Ellen
White had no patience with those who say, I am saved.
The quotation has been rearranged and has had the context
removed.
- Ellen
White had no patience with Christians who say, I am saved.
Ellen White was not denouncing the doctrines of justification
and righteousness by faith. The first quotation is not talking
about those who mean, "I have been justified." The
second quotation is referring to those who believe they can
continue to murder and steal and sell dope, and still go to
heaven.
- Adventists
believe that Jesus made the down payment for our salvation.
Thus the speaker contradicts the point he made under #141.
If Jesus made the down payment, then we don't have to work to
put ourselves on the road to salvation.
- Adventists
believe that Jesus made the down payment for our salvation,
but we must make the monthly installments. Thus it
is suggested that Adventists believe we partially earn our
salvation. This is false.
- Adventists
do not rely upon the grace of God alone. Ellen
White repeatedly said we must rely upon the grace of God
alone.
-
Adventists
are striving to be rigidly obedient. False. Many
Adventists will tell you that the Adventist Church has grown a
bit lax.
-
Adventists
are inflexible, guilt-ridden legalists. False.
While it is true that every faith has its legalists, the vast
majority of Adventists are opposed to legalistic concepts.
Legalism is generally not the cause of guilt but a faulty
method of trying to get rid of the guilt brought on by a
conviction of sin. Therefore the discovery of a genuinely
guilt-ridden legalist would indeed be a rare find, regardless
of his or her religious affiliation.
-
Ellen
White was wrong when she said that believers must keep the law
of God. Thus the video condemns not only Ellen
White, but Paul, John, Peter, Jude, James, and Jesus.
-
We
don't have to worry about obeying the law, since we are under
the New Covenant now, not the Old Covenant. A
popular antinomian argument, this doesn't really make sense in
the light of the only New Testament passage
describing the New Covenant.
-
We
don't have to worry about obeying the law, since Christ is the
end of the law. Since James 5:11 talks about the
"end of the Lord," we know that sometimes
"end" must mean something other than a cessation of
existence. Christ is "the end of the law" because
the law leads sinners to Christ for release from guilt (Gal.
3:24), not because the Ten Commandments don't exist anymore.
-
We
are not under the tutorship of the law, so we don't have to
worry about obeying the law. This inaccuracy
ignores what Paul meant by the phrase "under the
law."
-
Christians
will keep God's commandments out of love. Thus Mr.
Martin destroys the force of much of his whole argument thus
far: We don't have to keep God's law, but if we love God we
will gladly keep His law. The simple conclusion from his words
is that if we don't keep God's law, it shows that we don't
really love God.
-
Being
under the law leads to sin. Actually, according to
the New Testament, it seems more natural to say that sinning
leads to being under the law, rather than that being under the
law leads to sinning.
-
Being
under grace leads to holiness. Mr. Martin
contradicts himself again, for if we don't have to obey the
law, why would the grace of God lead to holiness?
-
A
pre-advent judgment of works is incompatible with the gospel
of grace. But this makes the apostle Paul
contradict Revelation 14:6, 7.
-
Soul
sleep was introduced because of the investigative judgment
doctrine. False. Soul sleep was introduced before
1844, and the video makes it clear that the investigative
judgment doctrine came after 1844.
-
The
doctrine of soul sleep is unbiblical. Not so.
Tyndale, Luther, Wycliffe, and many others came up with this
idea just from studying the Bible. Besides, saying that our
souls are immortal undermines the necessity of 1) the gospel,
2) the resurrection, and 3) the second coming.
- Conditional
immortality flies in the face of two Scriptures.
Actually, it doesn't, unless we want to say that the Bible
contradicts itself. Martin's interpretation of these two texts
in actuality flies in the face of hundreds of Bible texts from
Genesis to Revelation.
- Adventists
do not teach the biblical doctrine of hell.
Actually, Seventh-day Adventists do teach the biblical
doctrine of hell, and always have.
- The
Adventist view that Sabbath keeping is a mark of true loyalty
to God is severe. But the speaker basically already
admitted that Sabbath keeping is a mark of true loyalty to
God.
- Ellen
White obliged by conveniently having a vision.
Ellen White could not pretend to have a vision. Because of the
definitely supernatural characteristics of her visions, they
could not be faked.
- Her
vision about the Sabbath introduced the Sabbath to her
followers. The Sabbath was already well introduced
among Millerites before this vision of April 3, 1847.
- Adventists
weren't following what the Bible says about beginning the
Sabbath at sunset. The Bible "says" to
keep the Sabbath from "even to even." It doesn't
"say" to keep the Sabbath from sunset to sunset.
Therefore these Adventists were not blatantly disregarding the
Bible during the time they were unclear about the true meaning
of "even."
- Ellen
White decided to have another vision. As mentioned
before, for her to decide to have a vision was an absolute
impossibility.
- The
vision was intended to settle the matter with the dissenters.
According to one account, there were only two dissenters:
Joseph Bates and Ellen White. Does it not sound a bit
preposterous that since Ellen White wanted to convince
herself, she decided to have another vision? And this vision
didn't mention sunset at all or anything not contained in the
previous vision, except that they should study the Bible to
find out what "even" really meant.
- A
delegate reported that "After the conference, November
20th, the vision was given, establishing those undecided on
the sunset time." The use of this quotation is
devastating to these criticisms, for it comes from a pamphlet
that demolishes every argument in this part of the video.
- Adventists
continued to ask questions. False. It wasn't
Seventh-day Adventists per se who were asking questions. It
was their opponents.
- Mrs.
White had visions saying that the Sabbath should be kept from
6pm to 6pm. False. Ellen White never had a single
vision saying to commence the Sabbath at 6pm, or at any other
time than the biblical "even unto even."
- It
required another vision. False. The vision quoted
from is not even another vision. It's the same November 20,
1855, vision.
- In
her vision Ellen White promised to question the angel.
False. It was the angel that made a promise, not Ellen White.
- According
to Spiritual Gifts, Ellen White promised that they
would find out why the visions had first said to keep the
Sabbath from 6pm to 6pm. Out of context big time.
Only two sentences after the quotation used, Ellen White
denies ever seeing in vision that the Sabbath should begin at
6pm!
- Ellen
White died without ever giving the promised explanation.
This charge implies that Ellen White was supposed to, but she
was never told by the angel who would give the promised
explanation. The angel never said who.
- The
promised explanation was never given. Actually, the
promised explanation was given by 1868, 47 years before
Ellen White's death.
- After
the change of time for keeping the Sabbath, the Sabbath came
to be understood as the seal. False. The Sabbath
was understood to be the seal at least six years before the
change to sunset time.
- The
Sabbath was seen to be of prime importance in determining who
would be saved and who wouldn't. The average
viewer, uninformed about Adventist beliefs, will think that
Adventists believe Sunday keepers now have the mark of the
beast while Sabbath keepers have the seal. This is false.
- The
Great Controversy supports the idea that people have
already gotten the mark of the beast by keeping Sunday.
The viewer tends to arrive at this conclusion because of the
speaker's choice of verb tenses, and the missing context of
the quotation.
- Adventists
believe that failing to keep the Sabbath resulted in
one's receiving the mark of the beast and losing one's eternal
life. False. Adventists do not believe that this is
a present reality. The use of the past tense verb
"resulted" in describing a future event is an error.
- The
Adventist view today about the mark of the beast is severe.
How can it be severe to believe that Christians ought to obey
the commandments of God? What does this say about what Jesus
said: "If ye love me, keep my commandments"?
- Adventists
teach that Sunday keeping is a mark of rebellion.
Gross oversimplification. Given the standard Protestant
interpretations about the beast at the time Adventism arose,
and given some of the strong statements Catholics have made
about Sunday keeping, it's no wonder that Adventism arrived at
the interpretations that it did.
- Even
today, Seventh-day Adventists have made salvation ultimately
dependent on which day of the week one worships.
False. Adventists for the last century and a half have taught
that there are Sunday keepers who are bound for heaven and
Sabbath keepers who are bound for hell.
- Even
today, Seventh-day Adventists have made salvation ultimately
dependent on which day of the week one worships.
False. Adventists for the last century and a half have taught
that the reception of the mark of the beast is a future event,
not a present reality. And again, the use of the present tense
for "worship" is an error.
- The
New Testament says that the seal of God is the work of the
Holy Spirit, not the keeping of the Sabbath. It
isn't that simple. The New Testament indicates that the
last-day seal does have something to do with the fourth
commandment.
- Ellen
White has no support at all for identifying the Sabbath as the
seal of God. False. She has all kinds of support . . .
from the Bible.
- Christ's
resurrection day is the Lord's Day. False. The
Bible is crystal clear that 1) Jesus rose on the first day of
the week, and 2) the Lord's Day is the seventh day of the
week. One must wait over a hundred years after the
resurrection before one finds a document calling the
resurrection day the Lord's Day.
- Christ's
followers met regularly on the resurrection day for their
worship. There is no Bible evidence for this
statement. In all the New Testament, we have only one explicit
instance of the disciples meeting on the first day of the week
for worship. In that one instance, they met on what we call
Saturday night.
- Christ's
followers did not meet regularly on the Sabbath for worship.
False. This statement disagrees with the book of Acts.
- The
resurrection day was when the disciples usually broke bread.
False. Acts 2:46 says that they broke bread daily, not just on
Sabbath or on Sunday.
- They
did not break bread on the Sabbath. False. If they
broke bread daily, they must have done it on the Sabbath as
well.
- The
Sabbath is Jewish. False. Jesus Himself said that
He made the Sabbath for both Adam and all his descendents.
- Adventists
teach that Satan becomes the sin-bearer. False.
Ellen White taught, and Adventists teach, that Jesus is our only
sin-bearer.
- Thus,
Adventists differ from the plain teaching of Scripture that
Christ bore our sins on the cross. Straw man. A
Bible verse referring to the cross is used here to prove who
the scapegoat can and cannot be after the
atonement is finished.
- Adventists
strive to be included as mainline evangelical Protestant
Christians. Not really. We don't have to strive.
The largest church in the world says that we are the most
fundamental of the fundamentalists, and "the only
consistent Protestant."
- An
Adventist pastor supplied the following five marks of a cult.
But the letter these five marks came from says that the
co-producers and script writer of the video have been
supplying false information about Seventh-day Adventists for
14 years! The video's credibility is thus called into
question.
- There
is a "total reliance" by Seventh-day Adventists on
Ellen White. False. For Seventh-day Adventists, the
Bible is the final authority.
- Ellen
White is revered by all Seventh-day Adventists.
False. This is far from the case, as the video later admits.
- Ellen
White's comments overshadow the teachings of the Bible.
False, and the Documentation Package proves it.
- Adventists
consider Ellen White's comments on the Scriptures to be more
authoritative than tradition. Of course! We are
Protestants, and for Protestants tradition is supposed to be
subordinated to the Holy Scriptures. An inspired prophet would
be next in line in authority to the Bible, and tradition would
have to be less authoritative than that.
- Ellen
White pressured people into submission. False. She
was against pressuring people into submission.
- Ellen
White publicly aired reproofs sent to people.
False. When some of them were printed for the benefit of
individuals having similar problems, she almost always left
out the name and address of the guilty.
- Usually
the person conformed under the pressure.
Oversimplification. One instance being cited in the Documentation
Package essentially makes a joke out of this whole section
in the video.
- Usually
the person conformed under the pressure. The
incident just cited reveals a lack of pressure on Ellen
White's part.
- The
type of pressure Ellen White used is one of the marks of a
cult. Rather ludicrous. If such an idea be true,
then the prophets of the Bible were just as cultic as Ellen
White.
- Acceptance
and fellowship are very often withheld today.
The evidence indicates that this is false.
- Withholding
of acceptance and fellowship for questioning doctrine is a
characteristic of a cult. Questioning is one thing.
Attacking is another. Biblically, the church must deal with
members who practice grievous sins and teach false doctrines.
- Adventists
originally denied the deity of Christ. False. An
1853 Advent Review said, "Warn those who deny the
divinity of the only Saviour, that they must perish
everlastingly if they go on rejecting him, for it is fearful
and blasphemous to reject him."
- Adventists
must discontinue the doctrine that Michael is a name for
Christ. This can't be done while remaining true to
Scripture.
- "Michael"
being a name for Christ contradicts Hebrews 1:13.
False. Scripture uses the term "angel" in a number
of ways. Sometimes it refers to the uncreated Being who is
simultaneously called the "Angel of the LORD," God,
and Yahweh, and sometimes it refers just to the created
angelic beings, as in Hebrews 1:13. There is no biblical
justification whatsoever for insisting that Michael cannot be
the divine "Angel of the LORD" and must therefore be
a created being.
- Adventists
can't discontinue the doctrine that "Michael" is a
name for Christ without admitting that Ellen White made a
mistake. Oversimplification. Adventists would have
to admit that Charles Spurgeon, Matthew Henry, John Gill, and
a host of others made a mistake too.
- It
is impossible to accommodate both doctrines, that Christ is
divine, and that Michael is Christ. False, as can
be seen from #93.
- Adventists
have added the investigative judgment to salvation by
grace through faith in Christ alone. False.
According to the New Testament, to omit the judgment would be
to delete it from the gospel.
- Adventists
have added Sabbath keeping to salvation by grace
through faith in Christ alone. False. Omitting
Sabbath keeping from the New Covenant is to delete it
from Christ's will. It is illegal to alter a will after the
one who made the will dies.
- Adventists
have added obedience to the Ten Commandments as
requirements for salvation. False. Obedience is not
a requirement for justification or conversion. To omit
obedience from requirements for glorification is to
effectively preach another gospel than the gospel Paul and
Jesus preached.
- Adventists
have added obedience to other Old Testament laws as
requirements for salvation. But both the New
Testament and Old Testament prophecies about New Testament
times indicate that believers should still abstain from blood
and unclean animals, and should return the tenth to God.
- Adventists
believe that the world's sins have been placed upon Satan.
False. Adventists believe that no sins have been placed upon
Satan.
- Adventists
believe that the world's sins have been placed upon Satan
rather than upon Christ. False. Adventists do not
believe that Satan bears our sins instead of Christ. Christ is
the only Sin-bearer.
- Adventists
believe that Christians must stand before God without Christ
as their mediator. Straw man. Every Bible-believing
Christian who has studied the matter knows that Christ's
mediatorial work must cease just before He returns.
- This
contradicts Hebrews 7:25. Straw man. Hebrews 7:25 is talking
about the present. It is not talking about
eternity, when we will no longer need a mediator.
- Adventists
believe that salvation comes by placing sin upon Satan.
Utterly false. Adventists believe that salvation comes through
our Sin-bearer, Jesus Christ. The sins are only placed upon
Satan after salvation is completely finished. That
event is future.
- The
Adventist view of salvation, placing sin upon Satan, is not
the salvation taught in the Bible. Straw man. Since
this is not the Adventist view of salvation, the point is
totally irrelevant.
- Four
of the five marks of a cult apply to Seventh-day Adventists.
False. None of the five marks apply to Seventh-day Adventists.
- These
five marks of a cult are very important. If
Jeremiah Films really believes this, why don't they make a
video about a much larger church that clearly does fit these
marks?
- Adventist
leaders deceptively espoused the view of salvation by grace
alone in the 1950's. False. Adventists had been
teaching "grace alone" long before the 1950's. For
instance, Ellen White wrote that "by grace alone can they
be saved" in 1890. And in 1869 she wrote, "It is
through his grace alone that Satan can be successfully
repulsed."
- Many
followers felt betrayed by such an espousal of salvation by
grace alone. False. Some conservative members felt
betrayed because M. L. Andreason, a prominent theologian, said
that the book Questions on Doctrine contained
capitulations on some finer points of Adventist theology.
- Those
who felt betrayed began searching for themselves, and made
lurid discoveries. False. The conservative element
who felt betrayed did not do the searching referred to. The
liberal element who did not feel betrayed engaged in
"searching" into other issues, and in consequence
ultimately abandoned a number of crucial teachings found in
Scripture, including the teaching that Scripture must be the
final authority!
- "The
Adventist Church had deceived me." If the (mis)information
the preacher told you was anything like what is on this video,
then it was he who deceived you, not the Adventist Church. At
least, he didn't know what he was talking about.
- "I
was never presented with [Ellen White's copying] in the
[elementary] school system." Seems like 1st or
5th grade might be a bit early to deal with Peter or Jude
copying from each other. Though these are obviously not issues
for elementary school students to grapple with, I wouldn't be
surprised if some 7th or 8th grades do touch on it.
- ".
. . all these writings she had . . . plagiarized, . . . I
felt . . . lied to." Do you feel
lied to because between Matthew, Mark, and Luke, two copied
from the other? Do you feel lied to because John copied from
others when he put together the book of Revelation? Even
though they copied, can you prove that Ellen White, Matthew,
Mark, Luke, John, Peter, and Jude are guilty of
"plagiarism"?
- ".
. . the [Adventist] Church was inconsistent theologically and
politically." Straw man. Jesus said it would
be this way.
- ".
. . the [ Adventist] Church was inconsistent theologically and
politically." This argument is what many use
to excuse themselves from becoming Christians. The Bible
characters were woefully inconsistent too. Does that make them
members of a cult?
- "When
expedient, they . . . contradicted Ellen G. White. . . ."
The truth is out! Adventists don't follow Ellen White after
all.
- "The
last three years have been the most spiritually rewarding of
my thirty-one years as a Christian." This key
witness thus declares that he was both a Christian and an
Adventist for 28 years, part of which time he was an Adventist
minister as well. Despite all what the video says, according
to this speaker, Adventists are Christians, and
Adventist ministers are Christian ministers.
- The
Adventist Church does not uphold the Bible as the sole
authority of both faith and practice. If this is
true, which it isn't, why does everyone who becomes a member
of the Adventist Church have to vow before God that they
"believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God, and
that it constitutes the only rule of faith and practice for
the Christian"?
- "Jesus
saves us not by our deeds. . . ." Straw man,
since this is precisely what Seventh-day Adventists believe.
- "Because
you're not going to be able to get this information from your
church." It would be a rare church that could
produce this much misinformation single-handed.
- The
Documentation Package substantiates the information
contained in the video. The Documentation
Package substantiates hardly anything. Sometimes it proves
that the information on the video is erroneous.
- A
number of former high-ranking Adventist Church leaders are
featured on the video. Based on the information in
the video, not one former high-ranking leader is featured.
- The
video contains answers based on the best scholarship.
If this video contains answers based on the best scholarship,
what would the worst scholarship be like?
- The
video contains answers based on firm adherence to the truths
of God's Word. In actuality, the video undermines
faith in the authority and teachings of God's Word in a number
of subtle ways.
Major Factual Errors
- (#1) All
quotes of Ellen White in video are from official sources.
False. Some quotes just don't exist at all, or don't exist in
the form portrayed on the video.
- (#7) October
22 was not the Day of Atonement in 1844 False.
Biblically speaking, it was the Day of Atonement for that
year.
- (#8) Miller's
meetings were marked by emotionalism and hysteria.
False. Miller and his associates suppressed all such things.
- (#14) Ellen
White's first vision said that the 1843 chart should not be
altered. False. Her first vision was in December
1844. This one was on September 23, 1850.
- (#16) Ellen
White claimed God had made the mistake. False. She
made no such claim.
- (#18) Ellen
White's vision forced readjustment of many Adventist dates and
doctrines. False. Many dates and doctrines were not
readjusted as the result of either her first vision or the
vision of 1850.
- (#19 Ellen
White's vision readjusted the 1843 date to 1844.
False. It was already readjusted months before she had her
first vision.
- (#25) Twenty-seven
Fundamental beliefs say that the Bible is a source
of authority. False. They state that the Bible is the
source of authority.
- (#27) Some
of Ellen White's writings are unavailable, locked in a vault.
False. All published writings are available on CD-ROM.
Unpublished writings are available at 15 locations, and are
only locked away after hours.
- (#50) With
prophetic authority Ellen White supported the
shut-door-of-mercy doctrine. False. She never did.
- (#51) Her
first vision taught the shut-door-of-mercy doctrine.
False. Her first vision taught that there would have to be a
lot of evangelism yet before Christ returned.
- (#53) The
other shut-door-of-mercy passages were dropped after 1851.
False. There were no other shut-door passages.
- (#55) Adventists
never admitted their error regarding expecting Jesus to come
in 1844. False. Adventists freely admitted their
error.
- (#59) Soul
sleep was introduced because of the investigative judgment
doctrine. False. Soul sleep was introduced before
October 22, 1844, while the investigative judgment was
formulated afterwards.
- (#70) The
investigative judgment doctrine teaches that believers will be
lost if they have forgotten sins. Not even the Documentation
Package could find a quotation to substantiate this wild
charge.
- (#75) Seventh-day
Adventists have their own version of the Bible. Not
so. Jack Blanco's paraphrase is not in any sense an
official Seventh-day Adventist version. I do not own a copy
and have no present intention to get one.
-
(#77) In
The Clear Word, the words and ideas of Ellen White are
inserted into the biblical text. False. The words
and ideas of theologian and college professor Jack Blanco, not
Ellen White, are inserted.
-
(#81) The
Clear Word was written to support their prophetess.
The Clear Word contains the words and ideas of Jack
Blanco, not Ellen White, and was not written to support
"their prophetess."
-
(#86) Adventists
teach that Christ's atonement on the cross was incomplete.
This is blatantly false. Christ's atonement on the cross was
complete.
-
(#88) Adventists
teach that there is no hell. This is blatantly
false. Adventists consistently teach that there is a hell.
-
(#90) Many
of the doctrines of Adventists are similar to Jehovah's
Witnesses. This is no more true than the statement
that "many" doctrines of other denominations are
similar to Jehovah's Witnesses.
-
(#91) N.
H. Barbour was an early Adventist. False. The
impression is left that Barbour was a Seventh-day Adventist,
and there is no evidence that he ever was.
-
(#94) Uriah
Smith and James White denied the deity of Christ like the
Jehovah's Witnesses. False. They were always firm
believers in the deity of Christ.
-
(#95) Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists have produced
altered versions of the Bible. False. The New
World Translation is a translation produced by the
Watchtower Society. The Clear Word is an expanded
paraphrase put out by a private individual.
-
(#96) Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists have set dates
for Christ's return. False. Jehovah's Witnesses
have set dates, but not for Christ's return. And Sabbatarian
Adventists early on took a strong stand against date-setting.
Ellen White opposed such as early as 1845, even before
becoming a Sabbatarian. Seventh-day Adventists as such did not
exist in 1844.
-
(#97) Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists claim to be the
only remnant church. False. Jehovah's Witnesses
claim that, as of 1991, 99.9169% of Jehovah's Witnesses are
not the remnant.
-
(#99) Both
Jehovah's Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists were
"guilty" of plagiarism. J. A. Brown
published his book in Britain. Since there was no copyright in
America at the time on British books, neither Russell nor
anyone else could be said to be "guilty," even if
they had copied it.
-
(#102) Ellen
White's major books contained "stolen" material.
What she did cannot be called "stealing" since the
words she took did not belong to the original writers.
-
(#103) Sketches
from the Life of Paul was plagiarized in its entirety.
False. The books are different, as anyone who peruses them can
plainly see.
- (#104) This
resulted in a lawsuit. False. Such a lawsuit would
have been a legal impossibility.
- (#105) Because
of this, the book was quickly taken out of print.
False. Published in 1883, the book was promoted in Signs of
the Times through 1885, advertised in Great Controversy
through 1887, and included on the title page of Great
Controversy until 1907 in England, homeland of the authors
who were "stolen" from.
- (#107) The
main line of defense in the book The White Truth is
that there were no copyright laws back then. False.
Out of the six chapters in this 98-page book, one deals with
plagiarism. Out of 16 pages in that chapter, only 4 deal with
what copyright laws were like back then.
- (#108) The
White Truth says that there were no copyright laws back
then. False. Page 32 says that the first American
copyright law was passed in 1790.
- (#109) The
White Truth sidestepped the issue by concentrating on the
legal question. False. The video is confusing the
two allegations: 1) Ellen White was "guilty" of
theft. 2) Ellen White got her inspiration from others. The
White Truth deals with both allegations, as well as other
points.
- (#110) The
Adventist hierarchy has been unable to respond to Rea's
challenge: Prove that 20% of Ellen White's writings are
original. False. The "hierarchy"
responded to his challenge 31 years before his book was
written.
- (#115) Most
of her health advice dealt with suppressing the male sexual
urge. Absolutely ludicrous(!), as anyone who has
read her books knows.
- (#123) Ellen
White advised skipping all suppers in order to bring the male
sexual appetites under control. False. Professor
Fowler said this, not Ellen White. She consistently said that
some people need a third meal (though two meals are better for
most), and even called for Avondale College to begin to serve
suppers.
- (#128) Ellen
White controlled her female followers through directives on
dress. False. She was opposed to anyone forcing
convictions about dress on people.
- (#129) Ellen
White was against wearing any kind of wig. False.
The context of her statement clearly shows that she was not
talking about simple wigs. Her published and released
| |