|

Proving the Pioneer Position on the Daily
Guest Article:
Introduction
“I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand
of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the
figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid
a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it,
until His hand was removed.
“Then I saw in relation to the ‘daily’ (Daniel 8:12)
that the word ‘sacrifice’ was supplied by man’s wisdom,
and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave
the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour
cry.”
Early Writings, 74–75.
On the 1843
Chart, that we are told was 'directed by the hand of the
Lord'--The 'Daily' represents Paganism!
In 2nd Thessalonians we
follow William Miller’s reasoning on the power that is taken away for the
Papacy to appear, is the proof text for the ‘Daily’ being Paganism.
6 "And now ye know what withholdeth
that he might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth
already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the
way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume
with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his
coming: 9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all
power and signs and lying wonders, 10 And with all deceivableness of
unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of
the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send
them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might
be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
2 Thessalonians 2:6-12
We also make the point that those who
have not a love of the truth are going to receive strong delusion. We
believe that the truth they really do not have a love for is the truth about
the ‘Daily’. The truth about the ‘Daily’ is what brings the strong delusion.
In Daniel 8:13,14 you have the
foundation of Adventism. In verse 13 there is a question raised:
Daniel 8:13 Then I heard one saint
speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake,
How long . .
‘How long’ is a question of duration,
it’s not a question of a point in time. If the question was ‘when’, then it
would be a point in time. This is a question of duration of time—‘how
long’—it is not ‘when’, a point in time.
"How long shall be the vision"? In
Daniel 8 you see the word ‘vision’ in several places, but it is translated
from two different Hebrew words. One of those words is ‘chazown’, which
means the complete vision, the total vision. The other is ‘mareh’, which
means a specific point in the vision, a point in time.
In Daniel 8:15 ". . behold, there
stood before me as the appearance ‘mar'eh’ of a man." Here the word
is translated appearance, while everywhere else in Daniel 8 it is translated
‘vision’ and it means a point in time in the vision.
The word in verse 13 is ‘chazown’
referring to the entire vision, the complete vision concerning the Daily and
the transgression of desolation.
The modern theologians are teaching
that the ‘Daily’ represents Christ’s work in the sanctuary and the Pioneers
understood the ‘Daily’ to be Paganism. Both the pioneers and the modern
theologians agree that the transgression of desolation is the Papacy, no
questions on that, but the question is ‘what is the Daily?’
So if we go back to this question,
‘how long shall be the complete vision concerning –either Christ’s sanctuary
ministry or Paganism and the Papacy, and then it tells us what the Daily and
the transgression of desolation are going to do -- to give both the
sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?
So, if we believe that the ‘Daily’ is
Christ’s high priestly ministry –when did Christ begin that ministry? When
did Christ ascend to heaven? 31 AD. So if we take that approach, the
question is ‘how long is the total vision about the Papacy removing the
understanding of Christ’s sanctuary ministry and the Papacy to give both the
heavenly sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?’
Now, when did the Papacy come into
history?
The ‘Mystery of iniquity’ is mentioned
by Paul as already at work, so they were already at work but not on the
throne of the earth until 538. But let’s give the benefit of the doubt here
and say that the moment Christ ascended into the heavenly Sanctuary; the
Papacy began to remove the understanding of His work in the heavenly
sanctuary from the minds of men. So, that took place in 31 AD and the
question is ‘how long shall be the complete vision concerning the Papacy and
Christ’s sanctuary ministry to give both the sanctuary and the host to be
trodden under foot?
And we know what the answer is in
Daniel 8: verse 14: "And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three
hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed."
The earliest point in history that you
can argue that the Papacy was blocking the understanding of Christ’s
heavenly ministry would be 31 AD, if you are going to give them the benefit
of the doubt, which is the earliest you can possibly say this because He was
not doing His high priestly ministry before 31 AD.
So the earliest you can start this
vision, the question is ‘how long’, is 31 AD. And then it tells us we need
to understand that this vision is 2300 years long. So if you add 2300 years
to 31 AD., when did Christ begin the investigative judgment? 2331 AD-- He
hasn’t done it yet!
That is simple math and this is why we
are suggestion that the ‘Daily’ is the subject that brings strong delusion
on Seventh-day Adventists, let’s be realistic—this false view is what we are
teaching today, and whether we admit it or not, by teaching this we are
destroying the very foundation of Adventism!
If we go back to the pioneer position,
it says how long shall be the complete vision concerning Paganism, the
complete vision of Daniel 8, and that begins with the Medes and the
Persians, and then when you get into chapter 9 and you have the key to
understand the vision-- Daniel 9:25 "Know therefore and understand, that
from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem
unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two
weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous
times."
457 BC is totally within the history
of Daniel 8 and when you put the 2300 years onto it, it comes right to where
it is supposed to come –1844.
This is a very simple and profound
argument and it was William Miller who discovered and used it against those
in his day in the protestant world that were taking the wrong view of the
Daily. This was a foundational understanding that if you teach that the
‘Daily’ is Christ’s high priestly ministry you destroy 1844 and the
foundation of Adventism. William Miller knew it and opposed that very same
false view. But in the early 1900s, we began to take on these old false
views and to cover up the foundations so we could no longer understand these
things.
Looking now at verse 12, Daniel 8:12
"And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of
transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised,
and prospered."
This phrase ‘by reason of
transgression’ means ‘in transgression’, so what
it is saying is that a host, an army, was given the Papacy against Christ’s
high priestly ministry ‘in transgression’. If you are going to use the
Hebrew correctly and take the false meaning of the Daily, it means that in
this verse, Christ’s high priestly ministry commits sin! It is ‘in
transgression!’
But how reasonable the text is when
you follow the Pioneers: "And an host (army) was given him (the Papacy)
against the daily (Paganism) sacrifice by reason of transgression,
(In transgression--that is by uniting church and
state) and it cast down the truth to the ground; (The gospel, the Law and
the Sabbath) and it (the Papacy) practised, and prospered."
Also
see: 'Forgotten Truths of Bible Prophecy' |