ORGANIZATION or ORGANISM

SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST PIONEERS
STRUGGLE OVER THE PRINCIPLES OF
CHURCH ORGANIZATION
1863-1909 

Foreword

Neander that great church historian once wrote the following words, "No man can hinder the development of a principle once accepted." We know that principle from our garden. If you want to harvest potatoes you have to put them into the soil first. If you want to produce spinach you have to sow spinach. This kind of simple logic is soon forgotten when we enter church and its activities. No farmer would pray to God to bring salad out of spinach seed. Even when you would pray the stars from heaven it would not change the harvest.

Some people in the church sow tares (wrong principles), and then fast and pray to God to bring forth wheat. God will never do that. If you want a certain harvest, you sow a certain kind of seed. Or as Neander said, "NO ONE can hinder the development of a principle once accepted."

The reason why we publish this book is that we want to sow some right principles. Yet God has to bless the harvest. But remember, God will never bring forth a harvest of wheat out of tares (wrong principles).

Wim Wiggers

Introduction

The organization founded by Moses at Mount Sinai was a judicial organization. It was concerned with judicial matters. Let me illustrate.

Today, when a man breaks a civil law, the judicial apparatus is called into action. A judge cannot direct anyone's behavior if he has not broken any law. The only power which a judge has is judicial power, which power is implemented only when the law is transgressed.

When Moses organized Israel he organized only the judicial power, nothing else, as described in Exodus 18:21-27:

"Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, ruler of fifties, and rulers of tens: And let them judge the people at all seasons:... And Moses chose able men out of all Israel, and made them heads over the people ... And they judged the people at all seasons: the hard causes they brought unto Moses, but every small matter they judged themselves."

This judicial power did not have any power to rule; it had no possessions; it had no right to tax the people. All that it had were God's Commandments, nothing else. This power could not legislate. That is, Israel could not add, delete, or modify the law. Ellen White explains:

"The government of Israel was administered in the name and by the authority of God. The work of Moses, of the seventy elders, of the rulers and the judges, was simply to enforce the laws that God had given; they had no authority to legislate for the nation. This was, and continued to be, the condition of Israel's existence as a nation. From age to age men inspired by God were sent to instruct the people and to direct in the enforcement of the laws." PP 603

The above statement tells us that the only power Israel possessed was judicial power-not legislative power. A judge could not create a new law. If it would have been possible for a judge to create a new law, then he would have been able to judge every case before him in an arbitrary way, changing the law as he saw fit. But legislation is not the work of a judge. The only thing which a judge may do is to enforce existing law. The only legislative power in Israel belonged to God Himself. In this separation of power (legislation through God and enforcement through the chosen elders) was the condition of Israel as a nation.

In the surrounding nations it was completely different. Therein was the reason that Balaam said: "lo, the people shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations." Numbers 23:9. Israel was not a nation, in the true sense of the word, because in a nation there are three powers: executive, legislative and judicial. God Himself was the Executive and the Legislator. The people could only organize the judicial. That is the reason why Stephen called Israel "the church". When he referred to "the church in the wilderness," Acts 7:38 the word used here in the Greek is our word for church. That means that Israel was not a nation like every other nation; rather, it was a church. And God was the only King in His church.

When the first human king arose in Israel, God gave through the mouth of Jotham an object lesson regarding human kings in His church. Jotham said about Abimelech: "Hearken unto me, ye men of Shechem, that God may hearken unto you. The trees went forth on a time to anoint a king over them; and they said unto the olive tree, Reign thou over us. But the olive tree said unto them, Should I leave my fatness, wherewith by me they honour God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees? And the trees said to the fig tree, Come thou, and reign over us. But the fig tree said unto them, Should I forsake my sweetness, and my good fruit, and go to be promoted over the trees? Then said the trees unto the vine, Come thou, and reign over us. And the vine said unto them, Should I leave my wine, which cheereth God and man, and go to be promoted over the trees? Then said all the trees unto the bramble, Come thou, and reign over us. And the bramble said unto the trees, If in truth ye anoint me king over you, then come and put your trust in my shadow: and if not, let fire come out of the bramble, and devour the cedars of Lebanon." Judges 9:7-15.

E. G. White comments on these verses:

"By the olive, the fig-tree, and the vine, in Jotham's parable, were represented such noble, upright characters as Moses and Joshua, who had been a living illustration of what a leader of Israel should be. Such men claimed no kingly honors. It was their work to bless their fellow man, and they did not aspire to rank or power." ST 8-4-1881.

The history of Israel shows that every king of Israel was more or less a bramble. This bramble character of their kings was not always the personal fault of the king, but it belonged to the character of the kingship. God had warned them about this (1 Samuel 8). The kingship of Solomon, for example, was nauseating for the people (1 Kings 12). He was a bramble. Likewise will a human king in a church always be a bramble.

Solomon knew this, and was conscious of this fact. Hear his words:

"If thou seest the oppression of the poor, and violent perverting of judgment and justice in a province, marvel not at the matter: for he that is higher than the highest regardeth; and there be higher than they." Ecclesiastes 5:8.

The Jerusalem Bible expresses the same thought in this way:

"If in a province you see the poor oppressed, right and justice violated, do not be surprised. You will be told that officials are under the supervision of superiors, who are supervised in turn; you will hear talk of `the common good' and `the service of the king'." Ecclesiastes 5:8 (Jerusalem Bible, Popular Edition 1968).

In the Proverbs we read that in the animal kingdom God has given us examples of organization which He desires in His church and for His people. "There be four things which are little upon the earth, but they are exceeding wise: The locusts have no king, yet go they forth all of them by bands." Proverbs 30:24-27. In the sixth chapter he expresses the same ideas:

"Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise: Which having no guide, overseer, or ruler, Provideth her meat in the summer, and gathereth her food in the harvest." Proverbs 6:6-8.

These proverbs are not lessons in biology, but rather in organization. And so founded Jesus His church with no human authority, no human ruler, only human servants. To the Corinthians Paul wrote "For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake." 2 Corinthians 4:5.

In the New Testament church it was impossible for one person to be in the highest position, because the churches everywhere had the command of the Lord to "ordain elders [plural] in every city." Every church should have at least two elders, for the simple reason that we should not build a hierarchy, a pyramid. Moreover, these elders had executive power only within the framework of the judicial, to be used when the laws of God were violated. But the final decision was in the hands of the church (Matthew 16:18-19), and only in those cases where the keys of heaven were used (that is, the Word of God). In Matthew 18:17 we read that Jesus gave the church (not merely the elders) the power to purify the church from transgressors. And remember, no one has the right to legislate new rules or give new commandments.

According to E. G. White there is on this point no difference between the Old and the New Testament churches. We previously described the condition for Israel as a nation in Old Testament times. Let's listen to her comments for our times.

"Teach the people, He said, to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you. The disciples were to teach what Christ taught. That which He had spoken, not only in person, but through all the prophets and teachers of the Old Testament is here included. Human teaching is shut out. There is no place for tradition, for man's theories and conclusions, or for church legislation. No laws ordained by ecclesiastical authority are included in the commission. None of these are Christ's servants to teach. The law and the prophets, with the record of His own words and deeds, are the treasure committed to the disciples to be given to the world.... Nothing that does not bear His superscription is to be recognized in His kingdom." DA 826.

Nothing whatsoever! Judges cannot legislate; they cannot generate new rules, but may only enforce the rules and the laws of the legislative power. That was and is the founding condition for the Christian Church. In any other way, the judicial organization of the church is perverted. Jesus Himself is King in the church. Israel was not led by a human king, but by a prophet through the wilderness (Hosea 12:14). God revealed Himself through prophets (Hosea 12:11). So has He guided His church. God does not want a human ruler, king or authority in His church. He puts everyone on the same level, saying, "All ye are brethren." Matthew 23:8. And when everyone of the church members has the Holy Spirit as the organizing principle in his heart, then we will see an organization as described by Ezekiel, "for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels." Ezekiel 1:21. That is always the case. When there is a wrong spirit in the creatures, there is a wrong spirit in the wheels. When the Holy Spirit is in the creatures, then the Holy Spirit will be in the wheels. But to pray for the Holy Spirit to come in the creatures without the will to allow Him also in wheels, is an attempt to pervert God's church. Would it not be better to have the Holy Spirit, both in the creatures and in the wheels? E. G. White tells us:

"To the prophet, the wheel within the wheel, the appearances of living creatures connected with them, all seem intricate and unexplainable. But the hand of infinite wisdom is seen among the wheels, and perfect order is the result of its work Every wheel works in perfect harmony with every other. I have been shown that human instrumentalities seek after too much power, and try to control the work themselves. They leave the Lord God, the mighty Worker, too much out of their methods and plans, and do not trust everything to Him in regard to the advancement of the work

"No one should fancy that he is able to manage these things which belong to the great I AM. God in His providence is preparing a way so that the work may done by human agents. Then let every one stand at his post of duty, to act his part for this time, and know that God is his instructor." GCB 1897, p.236

In this book we want to make manifest that:

1. The original SDA organization which was founded in 1863 was an organization of counselors.

2. In 1873 Elder Butler substituted human authority for the organization of counselors.

3. Upon realizing this substitution, James White protested, declaring that the newly-accepted principles were evil principles.

4. E. G. White warned the brethren in 1896 that God would take things in His own hands.

5. In 1901 God indeed took matters into His own hands. He did it very elegantly, trying to sweep away all human authority. The messenger used by God to do this was A. T. Jones. He preached two sermons on organization, after Ellen White presented two sermons on the same subject. Ironically, the man who invited Jones to preach these sermons was A. G. Daniells.

6. In 1903 human authority was re-established in the church through exactly the same arguments and the same man as in 1873.

7. After the 1903 Conference, Ellen White compared our organization with the tower of Babel, declaring that we, as a church, had rejected the light; that is, the light on church organization.

8. In 1909 the monarchy was fully re-established in the church as E. G. White revealed.

All references presented herein have been carefully selected and presented, preserving the original context. As you ask the Holy Spirit to guide you through this book, let Him help you to decide which are the true principles of organization within God's church, and which are not.

Wim Wiggers

NEXT

Return to TOC